REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

 

LAW

 

ON

 

THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

 

 

Chapter 1

 

The Status of the Constitutional Court

 

 

Article 1. The Constitutional Court - a Court Institution

 

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania shall ensure the supremacy of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania in the legal system as well as constitutional legality by deciding, according to the established procedure, whether the laws and other legal acts adopted by the Seimas are in conformity with the Constitution, and whether the acts adopted by the President or the Government of the Republic correspond with the Constitution and laws.

In cases provided in the Constitution and this Law, the Constitutional Court shall present conclusions to the Seimas and the President of the Republic.

The Constitutional Court shall be an independent court which executes Judicial power according to the procedure established by the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and this Law.

 

Article 2. Laws on the Constitutional Court

 

The Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and this Law shall establish the objectives, powers, and work procedure of the Constitutional Court.

 

Article 3. Rules of the Constitutional Court

 

Internal questions of the Constitutional Court, the rules of professional con duct of judges, the structure of the Court apparatus, clerical work, and other issues shall be regulated by the Rules of the Constitutional Court, as approved by the Constitutional Court.

 

Article 4. Composition and Procedure of Formation of the

Constitutional Court

 

The Constitutional Court shall consist of 9 judges appointed for an unrenewable term of nine years.

Every three years, one third of the Constitutional Court shall be reconstituted.  The Seimas shall appoint an equal number of judges to the Constitutional Court from the candidates nominated by the President of the Republic of Lithuania, the Chairperson of the Seimas, and the Chairperson of the Supreme Court; the procedure shall also be used upon the renewal of the composition of the Court.  Upon the expiration of the term of office, judges shall continue their duties until new judges are appointed.

The Seimas shall appoint the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court from among the judges thereof who are nominated by the President of the Republic of Lithuania.

 

 

Article 5. Constitutional Court Judge Candidates

 

Citizens of the Republic of Lithuania who have an impeccable reputation, who are trained in law, and who have served, for at least 10 years, in the legal profession or in an area of education related to his or her qualifications as a lawyer, shall be eligible for appointment to Constitutional Court judge.

Names of candidates to Constitutional Court judge shall be announced through the press prior to the consideration thereof in the Seimas.

The State and Law Committee of the Seimas shall, at a closed sitting, consider the candidates nominated to the Seimas to the post of Constitutional Court judge, and shall then present their conclusions to the Seimas.

 

Chapter 2

The Status of Constitutional Court Judges

 

Article 6. Requirements for Constitutional Court Judges

 

Judges of the Constitutional Court may not hold any other elected or appointed office, and may not be employed in any business, commercial or other private institution or company, with the exception of educational or creative work.  They shall also be prohibited from receiving any remuneration other than the salary established for judges and payment for educational or creative activities.

Constitutional Court judges may not participate in the activities of political parties or other political organisations.

Constitutional Court judges may not be defense counsels or representatives of any company, institution, Organisation or person.

 

Article 7. The Oath of the Constitutional Court Judge

Before beginning office, persons appointed to Constitutional Court judge shall take an oath in a sitting of the Seimas.

The established text of the oath shall be:

 

(name, surname),

 

Swear to be faithful to the Republic of Lithuania;

 

Swear to honestly and conscientiously discharge the duties of the office of Constitutional Court judge;

Swear to defend the Constitutional order of the independent State of Lithuania and to protect the supremacy of the Constitution, obeying only the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania.

 

So help me God!"

 

The last sentence may be omitted from the oath.

The oath shall be administered by the Chairperson of the Seimas in a sitting of the Seimas.

The oath shall be administered in keeping with the regulations established for the procedure of administering the oath of Seimas members.

Constitutional Court judges who either do not take the oath in the manner prescribed by law, or who take a conditional oath, shall lose the powers of judge.  The Seimas shall adopt a corresponding resolution thereon.

 

Article 8. Immunity of Constitutional Court Judges

 

The person of a Constitutional Court judge shall be inviolable.

Constitutional Court judges may not be found criminally responsible, may not be arrested, and may not be subjected to any other restriction of personal freedom without the consent of the Constitutional Court. Questions of consent to institute criminal proceedings against a Constitutional Court judge shall be considered only upon the motion of the Prosecutor-General.

Constitutional Court judges who are detained or delivered to a law enforcement institution without personal documents must immediately be released upon establishing their identity.

Entry into the residential or office premises of Constitutional Court judges, the inspection or search of, or making a seizure in such premises or the inspection or search of, or making a seizure in personal or service automobiles or other per personal means of communication, the bodily inspection or search of judges, and the inspection or seizure of their property or documents shall be prohibited unless criminal proceedings have been instituted against the Constitutional Court judge according to the established procedure.

Criminal cases in which the accused is a Constitutional Court judge shall be tried by the Supreme Court.

Constitutional Court judges may not be persecuted for their speeches or voting in the Constitutional Court.

The powers and rights of the Constitutional Court and its judges may not be abridged upon the declaration of war or state of emergency.

 

Article 9. Powers of Constitutional Court Judges

 

Constitutional Court judges shall have the right to participate in Constitutional Court sessions with the right of decisive vote, to be granted free access to all material and documents submitted to Court sessions, and to exercise other rights provided for by this Law.

Constitutional Court judges shall propose issues for consideration at Constitutional Court sessions and shall prepare questions assigned to them.

Constitutional Court judges shall have the right to request that all state institutions and their officers, local government institutions and their officers, state and other companies, institutions, organisations, and citizens' associations submit any documents and information concerning the issue which is being prepared for Court hearing, as well as to receive the officers' explanations on all issues under examination.

Judges shall also have the right to summon and question witnesses and experts, to apply for consultations of specialists, to commission persons to carry out check ups, and to send inquiries.

Constitutional Court judges shall not have the right to publicly express their opinion concerning the main point of issues which are either under examination or have been adopted for examination in the Constitutional Court.

 

Article 10.  Suspension of the Powers of Constitutional

Court Judges

 

The powers of a Constitutional Court judge may be suspended on the decision of the Constitutional Court upon:

1) consent granted according to the procedure established by this Law to institute criminal proceedings against the Constitutional Court judge;

2)                    a resolution of the Seimas to initiate

impeachment proceedings in the Seimas against the Constitutional Court judge after the findings of the special interrogatory commission; and

3) the declaration of the judge as missing by an effective court order.

Upon suspension of their powers, judges shall lose the rights established by Articles 9 and 15 of this Law.

When the grounds for suspension of the powers of a Constitutional Court judge cease to exist, the Constitutional Court shall, within three days, adopt a decision concerning the restoration of the judge's powers.  If a decision is not adopted within the stated period, the powers of the Constitutional Court judge shall be considered restored from the day that the judge actually resumes his or her duties upon notifying the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court thereof by application.

 

Article 11.  Termination of the Powers of a Constitutional

Court Judge

 

The powers of a Constitutional Court judge shall be terminated:

1)  on the expiration of the term of office;

2)  upon the death of the judge,

3)  upon voluntary resignation;

4)  if the judge is incapable of fulfilling his or her duties for

reasons of health, i.e. if in the course of one year the judge is ill for more than four months, or if he or she falls ill with a fatal or other lingering disease which precludes him or her from discharging the duties of judge; and

5) upon being removed from office by the Seimas according to impeachment proceedings.

In the case prescribed by Par. 3 hereof, the decision concerning the termination of the powers of Constitutional Court judges shall be adopted by the Seimas on the recommendation of the Seimas Chairperson.

In the case prescribed by Par.4 hereof, the Seimas shall

resolve issues concerning the termination of the powers of judges only when there is a corresponding decision of the Constitutional Court and the findings of the medical commission formed by the Minister of Health.

 

Article 12.  Pecuniary Penalties

 

Disciplinary actions may not be brought against Constitutional Court judges.  For failure to carry out the duties established in this Law or for nonattendance of Court sittings without good reason, a pecuniary penalty entailing the reduction of the judge's previous month salary by as much as 50 percent may be imposed on the judge upon the decision of the Constitutional Court.

 

Article 13.  The Chairperson of the Constitutional Court

 

In addition to the duties of judge, the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall:

1)   direct the work of the Constitutional Court;

2)   direct the preparation of issues submitted to the

Constitutional Court for examination;

3)  convene and preside over sittings of the Constitutional Court;

4)  propose issues to be examined by the Constitutional Court;

5)   assign work to Constitutional Court judges;

6) submit the composition of the Constitutional Court apparatus and personnel to the Constitutional Court for approval, direct the work of the apparatus, and hire and dismiss the apparatus staff;

7) issue orders and directives; and

8)   exercise other powers prescribed by this Law.

In resolving   issues related to the work of the apparatus as well as other internal questions, the Chairperson shall issue orders;    the    Chairperson shall realise the procedural rights granted  to him or her by issuing directives.

The Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall manage the funds     appropriated for the operation of the Constitutional Court.

 

Article 14.  Acting for the Chairperson of the

Constitutional Court

 

In the absence of the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court or when he or she is not in the position to fulfill the duties of Chairperson, said duties shall be temporarily performed by a judge appointed by the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court.

In the absence of the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court or the judge appointed by him or her to carry out these duties, the office of Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall be temporarily executed by the Constitutional Court judge with the longest term of service as lawyer.

 

Article 15.  The Right of Constitutional Court Judges to

Participate in Sittings of State Institutions

 

The Chairperson and judges of the Constitutional Court shall be entitled to participate in sittings of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania and of its committees and commissions, as well as in sittings of the Government, the Senate of Lithuanian Judges, the prosecutor's office, and other legal institutions.

 

Article 16.  Social and Living Provision for Constitutional

Court Judges

 

Constitutional Court judges shall be paid a salary which is 30 per cent more than the maximum salary of a Superior Court judge.  The Chairperson or temporary Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall be paid a salary which is 10 per cent more than the salary of a Constitutional Court judge.

Upon leaving office because of expiration of the term or resignation due to pensionary age or health, judges of the Constitutional Court shall be paid gratuity on discharge equaling 6 monthly salaries.  Upon the death of a Constitutional Court judge, the benefit of the said amount shall be paid to his or her family.  When the powers of a Constitutional Court judge are terminated on other grounds, he or she shall be paid a gratuity equaling 2 monthly salaries.  Judges who are dismissed from office according to impeachment proceedings shall not be paid any gratuity upon discharge.

Pensionary provision for Constitutional Court judges shall be regulated by the Law on State Pensions and other laws of the Republic of Lithuania.

The    Government shall assign living quarters in Vilnius for

the term of office to Constitutional Court judges who either do not have    living quarters in Vilnius or who live in Vilnius and are entitled to State aid in acquiring living quarters.

Upon the expiration of their term, with the exception of the cases when Constitutional Court judges are dismissed from office according to impeachment proceedings, judges must be assigned a job or office in a state institution, or, when this is not possible, another analogous job or office.

 

 

Chapter 3

 

Basic Rules of Legal Proceedings in the Constitutional

Court

 

Section 1

 

Article 17.  Legality and Independence of Constitutional

Court Activities

 

In carrying out their duties, the Constitutional Court and its judges shall be independent of any state institution, person or Organisation, and shall act only in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania.

The Constitutional Court shall obey only the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and laws which are in conformity with the Constitution.

Interference with the activities of a judge or the Constitutional       Court by institutions of State authority and

administration,    the Seimas and its officers, political parties, political and    public organisations, or citizens shall be prohibited and shall incur liability under law.

The Chairperson and judges of the Constitutional Court must immediately inform the Seimas of attempts to influence the Constitutional Court or any of its judges, and must publicize this through mass media.

Meetings, pickets, and other actions staged within 100 metres of the Constitutional Court building or in the Court itself and which are aimed at influencing a judge or the Court, shall be considered interference with the activities of the judges or the Court.

 

 

Article 18.  Publicity of Constitutional Court Activities

 

Information concerning sittings of the Constitutional Court shall be declared on the premises of the Constitutional Court and announced in mass media through the Lithuanian News Agency (ELTA).

Constitutional Court sittings shall be open, and may be attended by citizens who are of age as well as by representatives of the press    and other mass media.  Persons who attend sittings in the Court    room may make tape recordings, short-hand records or records of  the hearing from their seats.

Taking photographs, filming, and making video recordings or television or radio broadcasts of hearings shall be permitted only upon the consent of the Constitutional Court.

The Constitutional Court may announce closed sittings provided that this is necessary for the safeguarding of a State, professional, commercial or other secret which is protected by law, or the security of a citizen or public morality.

If there are grounds to believe that during a sitting a threat may arise to the Court or the parties thereof, the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court may issue an order to the police to inspect the documents and belongings of persons entering the court room or to carry out bodily searches.

The Constitutional Court may remove persons interfering with the normal work of the Court from the court room.

 

 

The deliberation and voting of the judges of the Constitutional Court shall not be public, with the exception of cases provided for by this Law.

The ruling of the Constitutional Court shall always be announced publicly in the court room.

 

Article 19.  Joint Activities of the Constitutional Court

 

The Constitutional Court shall jointly investigate cases and arrive       at conclusions, provided that no less than two-thirds of all the       judges of the Constitutional Court are participating.

In    approving or amending the Rules of the Constitutional

Court, or in resolving other internal issues,         Constitutional Court sittings shall be legitimate provided than at least half of all the judges participate therein.

Rulings shall be passed by majority vote of at least half of the judges participating in the sitting.  In the case of a tie, the vote of the Chairperson shall be decisive.

 

Article 20.  The Language of the Court

 

In the Constitutional Court, legal proceedings shall be held and rulings shall be passed and announced in the Lithuanian language.  Documents written in other languages shall be submitted and announced in their Lithuanian translation and after having been approved by a notary.

People participating in sittings who do not know Lithuanian shall be guaranteed the right to use a translator.

 

Article 21.  Types of Constitutional Court Sittings

 

The Constitutional Court shall hold organizational and procedural sittings as well as court hearings.  Sittings shall either be convened by the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court or held at the time set by the Constitutional Court.

The form of organizational and procedural sittings shall be free.

Concrete cases shall be tried in court hearings.  These

hearings shall    be held according to the procedures established

by this Law.

 

Article 22.     Rulings and Decisions of the Constitutional Court

 

The Constitutional Court shall settle cases in essence by passing rulings.  The Constitutional Court shall announce rulings in the name of the Republic of Lithuania.

In cases provided by this Law, the final act of the Constitutional Court shall be called the conclusions.

The Constitutional Court shall adopt decisions on individual questions which prevent a case from being settled.

The Constitutional Court shall adopt rulings, conclusions,

and decisions in the deliberation room.  Upon consultation and without leaving    to the deliberation room, the Constitutional Court may adopt a decision concerning simple issues as well as the imposition   of penalties during a sitting.  When such a decision is adopted, the Chairperson of the sitting shall immediately    read it aloud and it shall be recorded in the sitting records.

 

Article 23.  Organizational Sittings of the Constitutional

Court

 

Internal    questions, issues of material investigation, and other issues    shall be considered and settled in organizational sessions.  The    Chairperson and judges of the Constitutional Court shall propose    issues for consideration.  The Constitutional Court shall approve the agenda and schedule of sittings by its decision.

If necessary, scientists, specialists, and other persons shall be invited to organizational sittings.

 

 

Article 24.  Preliminary Investigation of Material

 

Issues presented to the Constitutional Court for consideration must be preliminary investigated.  The Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall charge one or several judges with conducting the investigation upon setting the term for this

work.

The Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall evenly distribute the preparatory work to judges.

A judge, upon beginning the investigation of the material which is given, shall:

1)     ascertain that the grounds established in Articles 69 and 80 of this Law for refusal to examine a petition or inquiry are not present;

2)     ascertain that the grounds established in Articles 70 and 81 of this Law for the return of a petition or inquiry of the petitioner are not present; and 3) establish which issues must be clarified before the case is prepared for the sitting.

 

Article 25.  Report of the Results of the Preliminary

Investigation

 

Upon the carrying out of the preliminary investigation and necessary preparatory acts, a judge shall draw up a certificate with proposals and shall report it to:

1)   the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court, in proposing to

accept a petition or inquiry and begin the preparation of the case for a sitting of the Constitutional Court in the procedure established by Article 27 of this Law if the petition or inquiry is within the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court and is in conformity with other requirements of this Law;

2) the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court, in proposing to return the petition or inquiry to the petitioner if the material conforms to the conditions provided in Articles 70 and 81 of this Law; and

3)    the procedural  sitting of the Constitutional Court,            in proposing     to adopt a decision to refuse to examine the petition or inquiry     if the material conforms to the conditions provided in Articles     69 and 80 of this Law.

In settling the issues provided in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the first part of this Article, the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall adopt decrees.  If, due to the aforementioned issues, disagreements arise between a judge and the Chair-person of the Constitutional Court, such issues shall be referred to the procedural sitting of the Constitutional Court for the consideration and decision.

 

Article 26.  Suspension of Validity of Acts of the President or Government of the Republic

 

In cases when the Constitutional Court receives a motion of the President of the Republic to investigate the conformity of an act of the Government with the Constitution, or when it receives a resolution of the Seimas to investigate the conformity of an act of the President of the Republic or an act of the Government with the Constitution, the preliminary investigation of that material must be carried out within 3 days, and the issue of whether to accept the petition for a hearing in the Constitutional Court must be settled.

If the Constitutional Court adopts a decision to accept a petition for a hearing, the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall immediately give an official announcement about it either in "The News of the Seimas and the Government of the Republic of Lithuania" or in a special publication of the Seimas, or in newspapers through the Lithuanian News Agency (ELTA).  In this announcement, the Chairperson must state the exact title of the act in question, the date of its adoption, and that, in accordance with Article 106 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, the validity of the aforementioned act is suspended from the day of its official announcement until the ruling of the Constitution Court concerning this case is announced.

In cases when the Constitutional Court, having tried a case, adopts a ruling that the act in question is in conformity with the Constitution, the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall immediately make an official announcement about it in the publications mentioned in the second part of this Article.  In this announcement, the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court shall state the exact title of the act in question, the date of its adoption, the main point of the ruling of the Constitutional Court concerning this issue, and that the validity of the suspended act shall be restored from the day that this ruling is announced.

 

Article 27.  Preparation of Cases for Sittings of the

Constitutional Court

 

A case shall be prepared for a sitting of the Constitutional Court by the chairperson-appointed judge of the Constitutional Court.  Normally, this judge shall be the one who has carried out the preliminary investigation of the appropriate material.

The judge shall conduct the following activities:

1)  in necessary cases, interrogate the petitioner or the

petitioner's  representative about the main points of the

demands, hear the petitioner's arguments, and propose, if

necessary, that additional evidence be presented;

2) in necessary cases, interrogate the person concerned or the

person's representative about the circumstances of the case, ascertain the person's counter-arguments and available evidence, and, if necessary, propose that explanations concerning the case be presented in writing;

3)    interrogate witnesses and decide whether or not to summon them to the Court;

4) request and obtain documentary and material evidence and

other necessary material from persons, state institutions, and other organizations;

5) commission an examination, and summon and interrogate specialists who are impartial to the results of the case; and

6) carry out other actions which are necessary for the preparation of the case for the court hearing.

The  case material   - copies of the petition to verify the

conformity  of a legal act with the Constitution or laws, copies of legal acts under examination, copies of other received documents - must be sent to the parties to the case within 3 days of the beginning of the preparation        of the case for the court hearing.

The judge, having carried out preparatory acts and considering the case to be adequately prepared, shall propose to pass a decision to assign the case for the hearing in the Court sitting during a procedural sitting of the Constitutional Court.

 

Article 28.  Procedural Sittings of the Constitutional Court

 

 

The following issues shall be considered in procedural sittings of the Constitutional Court: issues concerning the acceptance of petitions provided in Article 26 of this Law; all cases of the refusal to examine a petition or inquiry; issues concerning the preparation of cases for hearing; and other issues of preparation for court hearings.

Having heard the report of the judge and having discussed the issue of the preparation of the case for the court hearing, the Constitutional Court shall pass one of the following decisions:

1)  to assign the case for hearing in the Court sitting and appoint a court speaker;

2) to return the case for additional investigation; and

3)  to refuse to hear the case in the procedure established in Articles 69 and 80 of this Law.

Minutes shall be taken during procedural sittings of the Constitutional Court.

Upon the invitation of the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court, scientists, specialists, and other necessary persons may participate in procedural sittings.  With permission of the chairperson of the sitting, said persons may speak on the issue.

 

Article 29.  Terms of the Hearing of Appeals in the

Constitutional Court

 

Upon receiving an appeal - a petition or inquiry - which is within the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court and which is presented in the procedure established by this Law, the Constitutional Court must begin investigation within 7 days, i.e. commission a judge of the Constitutional Court to start the preliminary investigation.

The hearing of the case must be finished and the final ruling or conclusions passed within 4 months of the day the petition or inquiry is received by the Constitutional Court unless otherwise provided by the Constitutional Court.

 

Article 30.  Limits of Court Hearings of the Constitutional

Court

 

The Constitutional Court shall investigate and decide only

legal issues.

 

Article 31.  Persons Participating in Cases

 

The following persons shall be considered parties to the case:

the petitioner - the state institution, the group of Seimas members who are granted by law the right to apply to the Constitutional Court with a petition to investigate the conformity of a legal act with the Constitution or laws or to pass a finding, or their representatives; the person concerned - the state institution which has adopted the legal act whose conformity with the Constitution and laws is under investigation or its representative; Seimas members or other state officers, the constitutionality of whose actions must be investigated due to impeachment proceedings which have been initiated against them in the Seimas or their representative; the President of the Republic, when conclusions are presented concerning his or her state of health or the President's representative.

The parties         to the case shall have equal procedural rights.

They shall have         the right to get familiar with the material of the case, make         extractions, duplicates, and copies from it, declare suspensions, provide evidence, participate in the investigation of evidence, question other persons, witnesses and experts participating in the case, make requests, give explanations, provide their own arguments and reasonings, and object to requests, arguments and reasonings of other persons participating in the case.

 

Article 32.  Representation in the Constitutional Court

 

Parties   to    the   case may conduct      their cases     in the Constitutional Court either personally or through their representatives.

According to the law, state institutions shall be represented by their heads, who shall present documents to the Constitutional Court which confirm their post.  Groups of Seimas members shall choose their own representative (representatives) and indicate this representative in the petition which is signed by all appealing Seimas members; their signatures shall be confirmed by the Seimas Chairperson or deputy Chairperson.

At behest, representatives of the parties to the case in the Constitutional  Court may be only advocates or persons possessing law degrees,  or persons having legal experience in higher state institutions. An advocate's powers of attorney shall be approved by the warrant.  Other persons shall be issued the powers of attorney by the heads of the institutions that they represent.

The head of the institution may also commission another employee of that institution for the representation of his or her institute by issuing that person the powers of attorney.

 

Article 33.  Parties to the Action

 

In this Law, parties to the action shall be considered parties to the case, their representatives, witnesses, experts, invited specialists and interpreters.

 

Article 34.  Evidence

 

Any facts shall be admitted as evidence on the basis of which the Constitutional Court states that there are circumstances which justify the requests or rebukes of the parties to the case or that there are no such circumstances.

These facts shall be established on the basis of explanations of the parties to the case, testimony of witnesses, documentary evidence, and findings of experts.

Each party to the case must prove the circumstances on the basis of which they make their requests and retorts.

Parties to the case shall present evidence.  If there is not enough evidence, the Court shall propose that additional evidence be presented.

The Court shall accept only that evidence which prove circumstances which are of importance to the case for

investigation.

It shall         be not required to prove the circumstances which

are recognized         by the Constitutional Court to be publicly known.

Facts which are established by ruling of the Constitutional Court which have become legal in one case shall not be proved again in hearings of other cases.

 

Article 35.  Assessment of Evidence

 

Evidence presented to the Constitutional Court shall have no obligatory force in advance.

The Court shall assess evidence in accordance with the inner conviction of judges which shall be based on the detailed, comprehensive and objective examination of the whole complex of the circumstances of the case in the Court sitting and in observance of the laws.

 

Article 36.  The Witness

 

Any person who may know some circumstances related to a case may be a witness.  A person summoned to be a witness must appear before the Court or the judge and must testify truthfully.

For failure to appear before the judge or the Court due to reasons which are recognized as unimportant by the Court, a penalty may be imposed on the witness; if the witness fails to appear at a sitting without a valid reason for a second time, he or she may be brought by force by the police.

For the refusal or avoidance of testimony, or for knowingly

False testimony, a witness shall be liable in accordance with laws. Witnesses shall be warned about their liability in the sitting of the Constitutional Court and shall sign on.

Expenses related to the appearance of witnesses before the judge and their participation in sittings of the Constitutional Court shall be covered from the funds assigned to the Constitutional Court for those purposes.

 

Article 37.  The Expert

 

A person having the required knowledge to provide findings may be appointed as an expert.  If necessary, several experts may be appointed.

The judge who prepares the case for hearing shall have the

right to ask questions to which the expert's findings must be provided, while  each party to the case shall have such a right during the sitting.

These questions shall be finally determined by the Court.  Upon the summons of the Court or a judge, a person appointed as expert must be in attendance and provide the objective findings on the questions posed.

Experts shall   have the   right to get familiar with the case material, to participate in the case hearing, to address witnesses and persons participating in the case with questions, and to ask for additional material.

Penalties may be imposed on experts for failure to attend upon the summons of the Court or a judge or for an unjustified refusal to provide the findings.

Experts shall be liable in accordance with criminal laws for providing the findings which are knowingly false.  Experts shall be warned of this and shall sign on.

Experts shall   be compensated   for their work if the work is not obligatory to them by virtue of their office, as well as for other expenses   incurred for participation in the sitting of the Constitutional Court from the funds   assigned to the Constitutional Court for these purposes.

 

Article 38.  Expert Findings

 

Expert findings shall be presented in writing and shall be

set forth in the    examination act which state the executed

investigations, the    findings made on their basis,         and the reasoned answers to the questions posed by the Court.

If there are several experts, they shall deliberate among themselves before providing the findings.  If the experts reach the common findings, that findings shall be signed by all of the experts.  Experts who do not agree with other experts shall sign their own findings.

Expert findings shall have no obligatory force in advance.

 

Article 39.  Compensation of Exr)enses Incurred by Parties       to the Case

 

Expenses of the parties to the case related to attendance and participation in legal proceedings of the Constitutional Court shall be compensated by the institutions which they represent.

 

Article 40.  The Right of the Constitutional Court to Impose Penalties

 

The Constitutional Court shall have the right to impose penalties when:

1)       officials and persons, at the set time and without valid reasons, fail to fulfill the requirements of the Constitutional Court or its judge to present documents or material, to approve documents or texts of acts, or to carry out investigations;

2)       without valid reasons, a witness or expert fails to

attend, refuses to attend, or does not inform of their failure to appear before the Constitutional Court or the judge;

3)  an expert, without valid reasons, refuses to provide the findings;

4)     a party to the case, after being reprimanded once, speaks out of turn or insults participants of the sitting or the Court a second time; and

5)     a person who is in the court room violates order or does not listen    to  the demands of the Chairperson of the sitting to maintain       order.

The    Constitutional Court shall have the right to impose a

Penalty on citizens and representatives of the parties to the case equalling up to one average monthly salary, and on officials - up to four average monthly salaries for each case of violation.

When violations stated in the first part of this Article are committed during a sitting, the decision of the Constitutional Court concerning the imposition of a penalty shall be passed immediately during the sitting.  In other cases, the decision concerning the imposition of a penalty shall be passed after the investigation.  In all cases, the decision of the Constitutional Court concerning the imposition of a penalty shall be entered into the record of the sitting where the name, surname, working place and address of the violator shall be stated.

The decision of the Constitutional Court concerning the imposition of a penalty (extract from the record of the sitting) shall be sent to the bailiff to conduct.

 

Article 41.  Joining of Petitions

 

Upon establishing that there are two or more petitions concerning the conformity of the same legal act with the Constitution or laws, the Constitutional Court may join them into one case before the beginning of the court hearing.

 

Article 42.  Summonses of the Constitutional Court

 

Parties to the case and their representatives shall be

informed by summonses of the Court of the time of the sitting of the Constitutional Court and the time and place of performance of separate procedural actions.     Witnesses, experts and interpreters shall be summoned to the Court by summonses as well.

Consequences for failure to appear before the Court shall be stated in the summons.

Summonses shall be delivered through messengers or by mail.  The time when the addressee is presented with the summons shall be stated in the delivered summons and in the part of the summons returned to the Court which shall contain the signature confirming the delivery of the summons.

Summons to appear in court for parties to the case must be delivered no later than 7 days before the beginning of the sitting.

 

Article 43.  Sitting Notices

 

Sitting notices must be presented to judges of the Constitutional Court no later than 7 days before the beginning of the sitting.  Duplicates of the material of the case under examination shall be delivered to the judges upon the commencement of the preliminary investigation of the material.

 

 

Section 2

 

Court Proceedings

 

 

Article 44.  Court Hearings

 

A case shall be investigated by the Constitutional Court only once the parties to the case have been notified of this.  Absence of the parties in a court hearing shall not be an obstacle in conducting the investigation of the case, passing a ruling or conclusion, or adopting other decisions.

While investigating a case, the Constitutional Court must directly examine evidence: they must listen to the statements of the persons participating in the case, the testimony of witnesses, and the findings of experts, and must examine written and other evidence.

The Court shall not have the right to investigate other cases until the investigation of the case at hand is settled or its investigation is suspended.

Only parties to the case, their representatives, witnesses, experts, and invited specialists and officers may speak in the Court.

 

Article 45.  The Chairperson of Court Hearings

 

Court hearings shall be presided over by the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court; in the absence or on the instruction of the Chairperson, hearings shall be presided over by the deputy Chairperson of the Constitutional Court, and if they are also absent - by a judge selected by the Constitutional Court other than the judge who is acting as speaker.

The presiding Chairperson: shall conduct the hearing and take measures

t