|
|
|
Back to
Allegory Index
Back to Philo
Index
from Philo's
On
the Account Of the World's Creation Given
by Moses
Philo came from a rich and influential
Jewish family living in Alexandria, Egypt. Philo
was probably born about 20
B. C. E. and died sometime after 40 C.E./A.D. His lifetime
spanned the lifetime of Christ.
Alexandria at that time was the foremost center of Greek
culture and an important
center of Jewish culture and learning, too. It was here that the
Septuagint [Greek] version
of the Old Testament was largely produced. PhiIo was educated
in both Greek and Jewish
scholarship.
[Moses], that great master, holding
the unoriginate to be of a different order from
that which is visible, since
everything that is an object of sensible perception is subject
to becoming and to constant
change, never abiding in the same state, assigned to that
which is invisible and an object
of intellectual apprehension the infinite and undefinable
as united with it by closest
tie; but on that which is an object of the senses he bestowed
"genesis," "becoming" as its
appropriate name.
Seeing then that this world is
both visible and perceived by the senses, it follows that
it must also have had an origin.
Whence it was entirely to the point that he put on record
that origin, setting forth in
true grandeur the work of God.
III. He says that in six days
the world was created, not that its Maker required a
length of time for his work,
for we must think of God as doing all things simultaneously,
remembering that "all" includes
with the commands which He issues the thought behind
them. Six days are mentioned
because for the things coming into existence there was
need of order. Order involves
number, and among numbers by the laws of nature the most
suitable to productivity is
6, for if we start with 1 it is the first perfect number, being equal
to the product of its factors
i. e., 1 x 2 x 3), as well as made up of the sum of them (i. e.,
1 + 2 + 3), its half being 3,
its third part 2, its sixth part 1. We may say that it is in its
nature both male and female,
and is a result of the distinctive power of either. For among
things that are, it is the odd
that is male, and the even female. Now of odd numbers 3 is
the starting point, and of even
numbers 2, and the product of these is two is 6. For it was
requisite that the world, being
most perfect of all things that have come into existence,
should be constituted in accordance
with a perfect number, namely six; and inasmuch as
it was to have in itself beings
that sprang from a coupling together, should receive the
impress of a mixed number, namely
the first in which odd and even were combined, one
that should contain the essential
principle both of the male that sows and of the female
that receives the seed.
. . .
[T]he earth put forth plants
and bore herbs before the heaven was furnished. But
the heaven was afterwards duly
decked in a perfect number, namely four. This number
it would be no error to call
the base and source of 10, the complete number; for what 10
is actually this, as is evident,
4 is potentially; that is to say that, if the numbers from 1
to 4 be added together, they
will produce 10, and this is the limit set to the otherwise
unlimited succession of numbers;
round this as a turning point, they wheel and retrace
their steps.
4 also contains the ratios of
the musical consonances, that produced by an interval of
four notes, and that produced
by an interval of five, and the octave and double octave as
well. And it is out of these
that the most perfect concord is produced. Of that produced
by an interval of four notes
the ratio is 1 1/3, of that produced by an interval of five 1 1/2, of
the octave 2, of the double
octave 4. All of these the number 4 embraces in itself, 1 1/3 in
the ratio 4:3; 1 1/2 in the
ratio 6:4; 2 in the ratio 4:2; 4 in the ratio 4:l.
XVI. There is also another property
of the number 4 very marvelous to state and to
contemplate with the mind. For
this number was the first to show the solid, the numbers
before it referring to things
without actual substance. For under the head of 1 what is
called in geometry a point falls,
under that of 2 a line. For if 1 extend itself, 2 is formed,
and if a point extend itself,
a line is formed: and a line is length without breadth, if breadth
be added, there results a surface,
which comes under the category of 3: to bring it to a
solid surface needs one thing,
depth, and the addition of this to 3 produces 4. The result
of all this is that this number
is a thing of vast importance. It was this number that led us
out of the realm of incorporeal
existence patent only to the intellect, and has introduced
us to the conception of a body
of three dimensions, which by its nature first comes within
the range of our senses. Anyone
who does not understand what I am saying will catch
my meaning if he calls to mind
a very familiar game. Players with nuts are in the habit
of setting forth three nuts
all on one level and of adding one to these, thus forming a.
pyramidal figure. The figure
of the triangle on the level only reaches the number 3; the
added nut produces, in numbers
4, but in figures a pyramid, a body rendered solid by
its accession. In addition we
must remember also that first among numbers 4 is a square,
made up of equal factors multiplying
into one another, a measure of rightness and equality,
and that alone among them it
is such as to be produced from the same factors whether
added or multiplied together
...
There are several other powers
of which 4 has the command ... 4 was made the
starting-point of the creation
of heaven and the world, for the four elements, out of which
this universe was fashioned,
issued, as it were from a fountain, from the numeral 4; and,
besides this, so also did the
four seasons of the year, which are responsible for the coming
into being of animals and plants,
the year having a fourfold division into winter and spring
and summer and autumn.
XVII. The aforesaid numeral,
then, having been deemed worthy of such high privilege
in nature, it was a matter of
course that its Maker arrayed the heaven on the fourth day
with a most divine adornment
of perfect beauty, namely the light-giving heavenly bodies;
and, knowing that of all things,
light is best, He made it the indispensable means of sight,
the best of the senses; for
what the intellect is in the soul, this the eye is in the body; for
each of them sees, one the things
of the mind, the other the things of sense; and they have
need, the mind of knowledge,
that it may become cognisant of incorporeal objects, the eye
of light, for the apprehending
of bodily forms.
Light has proved itself the source
of many other boons to mankind, but pre-eminently
of philosophy, the greatest
boon of all. For man's faculty of vision, led upwards by light,
discerned the nature of the
heavenly bodies and their harmonious movement. He saw the
well-ordered circuits of fixed
stars and planets, how the former moved in unchanging orbit
and all alike, while the latter
sped round in two revolutions out of harmony with each other.
He marked the rhythmic dances
of all these, how they were marshalled by the laws of a
perfect music, and the sight
produced in his soul an ineffable delight and pleasure.... And
then, as usually happens, it
went on to busy itself with questionings, asking What is the
essence of these visible objects?
Are they in nature unoriginate, or had they a beginning
of existence? What is the method
of their movement? And what are the principles by
which each is governed? It was
out of the investigation of these problems that philosophy
grew, than which no more perfect
good has come into the life of mankind....
XX. Earth and heaven having been
equipped with the array appropriate to either--
earth on the third day, heaven,
as has been recounted, on the fourth--the Creator took in
hand to form the races of mortal
creatures, beginning with aquatic creatures on the fifth
day, deeming that there is no
kinship so close as that between animals and the number
5. For living creatures differ
from those without life in nothing more than in ability to
apprehend by the senses; and
sense has a fivefold division, into sight, hearing, taste, smell,
and touch...
After the fishes, He made the
birds and land creatures; for when we come to these,
we find them with keener senses
and manifesting by their structure far more clearly all the
qualities proper to beings endowed
with the life-principle.
To crown all ...He made man,
and bestowed on him mind that excellence, life-principle
of the life-principle itself,
like the pupil in the eye: for of this too those who investigate
more closely than others the
nature of things say that it is the eye of the eye. . . .
XXIII. After all the rest, as
I have said, Moses tells us that man was created after the
image of God and after His likeness
(Gen. i. 26). Right well does he say this, for nothing
earth-born is more like God
than man. Let no one represent the likeness as one to a bodily
form; for neither is God in
human form, nor is the human body God-like. No, it is in
respect of the Mind, the sovereign
element of the soul, that the word "image" is used; for
after the pattern of a single
Mind, even the Mind of the Universe as an archetype, the mind
in each of those who successively
came into being was moulded. It is in a fashion a god to
him who carries and enshrines
it as an object of reverence; for the human mind evidently
occupies a position in men precisely
answering to that which the great Ruler occupies in
all the world. It is invisible
while itself seeing all things, and while comprehending the
substance of others, it is as
to his own substance unperceived; and while it opens by arts
and sciences roads branching
in many directions, all of them great highways, it comes
through land and sea investigating
what either element contains....
And, since images do not always
correspond to their archetype and pattern, but are
in many instances unlike it,
the writer further brought out in his meaning by adding "after
the likeness" to the words "after
the image," thus showing that an accurate cast, bearing
a clear impression, was intended.
XXIV. One may not unfitly raise
the question what reason there could be for his
ascribing the creation in the
case of man only not to one Creator as in the case of the rest
but, as the words would suggest,
to several. For he represents the Father of the universe
as speaking thus, "Let us make
man after our image and likeness." 'Can it be,' I would
ask, 'that He to whom all things
are subject is in need of anyone whatever? . . . The full
truth about the cause of this
it must needs be that God alone knows, but the cause which
by probable conjecture seems
plausible and reasonable we must not conceal. It is this.
Among existences some partake
neither of virtue nor of vice, like plants and animals devoid
of reason; the one sort because
they are without animal life and furnished with a nature
incapable of consciously receiving
impressions; the other sort because from them mind and
reason have been eliminated:
for mind and reason are as it were the dwelling-place of vice
and virtue, which are by nature
constituted to make their abode in them. Others again have
partnership with virtue only,
and have no part or lot in vice. Such are the heavenly bodies;
for these are said to be not
only living creatures, but living creatures endowed with mind,
or rather each of them a mind
in itself, excellent through and through and unsusceptible
of any evil. Others are of mixed
nature, as man, who is liable to contraries, wisdom and
folly, self-mastery and licentiousness,
courage and cowardice, justice and injustice, and (in
a word) to things good and evil,
fair and foul, to virtue and vice. Now it was most proper
to God the universal Father
to make those excellent things by Himself alone, because of
their kinship to Him. To make
those which are neither good nor bad was not alien to
Him, since those too are free
from vice which is hateful to Him. To make those of mixed
nature was in one respect proper
to Him, in another not so; proper, so far as the better
principle which forms an ingredient
in them is concerned; alien, in virtue of the contrary
and worse principle. So we see
it is only in the instance of man's creation that we are told
by Moses that God said, "Let
us make man," an expression which plainly shows the taking
with Him of others as fellow-workers.
It is to the end that, when man orders his course
aright, when his thoughts and
deeds are blameless, God the universal Ruler may be owned
as their Source; while others
from the number of His subordinates are held responsible for
thoughts and deeds of a contrary
sort: for it could not be that the Father should be the
cause of an evil thing to His
offspring: and vice and vicious activities are an evil thing. . . .
. . .
XXX. Now when the whole world
had been brought to completion in accordance with
the properties of six, a perfect
number, the Father invested with dignity the seventh day
which comes next, extolling
it and pronouncing it holy; for it is the festival, not of a single
city or country, but of the
universe, and it alone strictly deserves to be called "public"
as belonging to all people and
the birthday of the world. I doubt whether anyone could
celebrate the properties of
the number 7, for they are beyond all words.... Now 7 or 7th
is a term used in two different
senses. There is the 7 inside the number 10. This consists
of 7 units and is determined
by the sevenfold repetition of the unit. There is the 7 outside
the number 10. This is a number
starting throughout from the number 1 and formed
by doubling it and going on
doubling (7 times) or trebling, or multiplying by any other
number in regular progression;
as, for example, the number 64 is the product of doubling
from 1 onwards, and the number
729 that of trebling. Each of these forms claims more
than casual notice. The second
form clearly has a very manifest superiority. For invariably
the 7th term of any regular
progression, starting with unity and with a ratio of 2,3, or any
other number, is both a cube
and a square, embracing both forms, that of the incorporeal
and that of the corporeal substance,
the form of the incorporeal answering to the surface
which is formed by squares,
that of the corporeal answering to the solid which is formed
by cubes. [For example
1 2 4 8 16 32 64; 64 = 82,
64 = 43
1 3 9 27 81 243 729; 729 = 272,
729 = 93
1 5 25 125 625 3125 15625; 15625
= 1252, 15625 = 253 ]
[There follow over twelve
more pages on the properties and qualities of 7. Some of the
highlights:
· 7 consists of 1, 2,
and 4, which have two relations making specially for harmony, the
twofold and the fourfold, the
one producing the diapason harmony, while the fourfold
relation produces double diapason.
· 6:1, 5:2, 4:3 are also
musically significant.
· Being made up of 3 and
4, 7 represents all that is naturally steadfast and upright in
the universe. The right-angled
triangle is made up of sides of 3,4,5. Sides 3 and 4
produce the right angle; the
obtuse and acute angle are manifestations of irregularity
and disorder and inequality:
one such angle can be more acute or obtuse than another,
whereas the "right" angle is
invariable. Thus 7 is the fountain-head of every figure
and every definite shape.
· 7 is the starting point
of all plane and solid geometry (3 points constitute a plane, 4
a solid), and thus all incorporeal
and corporeal things.
· Some numbers from 1
to 10 beget without being begotten; some are begotten but do
not beget; some both beget and
are begotten. 7 alone does not fit in any of these
categories. (1 begets all subsequent
numbers, but is begotten by none. 8 is begotten
by 2 x 4, but begets no number
within 110; 4 is both begotten 12 x 2] and begets [2 x 4].
"It is in the nature of 7 alone,
as I have said, neither to beget nor to be begotten. For
this reason other philosophers
liken this number to the motherless and virgin Nike, who is said
to have appeared out of the
head of Zeus, while the Pythagoreans liken
it to the chief of all things:
for that which neither begets nor is begotten remains
motionless ...There is only
one thing that neither causes motion nor experiences it,
the original Ruler and Sovereign.
Of Him 7 may be fitly said to be a symbol."
· 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 ~
6 + 7 = 28 (the time of the complete lunar cycle).
· Every body has 3 dimensions:
length, width, and depth and 4 limits: point, line,
surface, and solid.
· Hippocrates claims a
person's development goes through 7 stages (the so-called Seven
Ages of Man).
· Alternatively Solon
organizes human development into 10 stages of 7 years each (10
'weeks' of years).
· The heavens are divided
into 7 zones, the planets are marshalled in 7 ranks, the Great
Bear [the Big Dipper] contains
7 stars.
· Apart from understanding
(reason), our souls are divided into 7 parts: the 5 senses,
speech, and the generative faculty.
All are controlled by the understanding (or reason)
like puppets.
· The outward form of
the human body is composed of seven main parts: head, breast,
belly, two arms, and two legs;
its inner parts are also 7: stomach, heart, lung, spleen,
liver, 2 kidneys. The head also
has 7 parts: 2 eyes, 2 ears, 2 nostrils, and a mouth.
· The classes of visible
objects are seven: body, extension [spatiality ?], shape, size,
colour, movement, and quiescence.
· The varieties of the
voice (vowels) are also 7: the acute, the grave, the circumflex, the
rough (aspirated), the thin
(unaspirated), the long, and the short.
· There are 7 movements:
upward, downward, to the right, to the left, forward, backward,
in a circle.
· In grammar, there are
seven vowels.
· In music, the 7-stringed
lyre, which corresponds to the choir of the 7 planets, provides
the rule to which the making
of all musical instruments conforms. ]
XLIV. In his concluding summary
of the story of creation [Moses] says: "This is the
book of the genesis of heaven
and earth, when they came into being, in the day in which
God made heaven and the earth
and every herb of the field before it sprang up" (Gen. ii.
4-5). Is he not manifestly describing
the incorporeal ideas present only to the mind, by
which, as by seals, the finished
objects that meet our senses were moulded? For before the
earth put its young green shoots,
young verdure was present, he tells us, in the nature of
things without material shape,
and before the grass sprang up in the fields, there was in
existence an invisible grass.
We must suppose that in the case of all other objects also,
on which the senses pronounce
judgment, the original forms and measures, to which all
things that come into being
owe shape and size, subsisted before them; for even if he has
not dealt with everything in
detail but in the mass, aiming as he does at brevity in a high
degree, nevertheless what he
does say gives us a few indications of universal Nature, which
brings forth no finished product
in the world of sense without using an incorporeal pattern.
Trans. F. Il. Colson and Rev.
G. H. Whitaker, Loeb Classical Library [Philo, I, 13-102
passim]
Back to Philo
Index
Back to
Allegory Index |