Victor J. Vitanza
My Office: Carlisle Hall 211 |
| Course Description and Objectives: |
The primary purpose is to introduce some of the characters who have been canonized as being in the grand narrative of The History of Rhetoric.
Other purposes:
|
|
| Assignments: |
Every week each of you will present a one-sentence response to the readings. (We will not linger over these; they are to give some indication of an insight that you had during your week of reading.) Every week, one of you will present a three-page, double-spaced position statement on the readings, with the object being the stimulation of discussion. (We may linger over this paper for a while.) At the end of the semester, each of you will submit a twenty page paper, fully researched and documented, on some aspect of the content of the course. (At the final class, each of you will make a brief presentation of your project and what your provisional conclusions are.)
A possible exception to the number of papers: If enrollment is below 10 students, I will moderate the number of three-page papers in the light of the final research paper. In other words, I may require all brief papers, say, seven of them and no final paper, or any combination of both short and long papers.
The Topics of your twenty-page papers must be approved by me. I want a prospectus stating precisely what you intend to do and how you are going to do it. And I want a preliminary bibliography. I have a number of topics in mind if you are interested. (All papers are to be written following the standard research and writing academic protocols.) Papers are to be documented according to the MLA style sheet.
Since this is an advanced seminar, I will not weigh the work done by M.A. and Ph.D. students in the same way. I will expect much more from the doctoral rhetoric students.
| Grades: |
Participation in class and on line counts 1/4; papers presented in class counts 1/4; major project counts 1/2. (There will be a Listserv discussion group for this seminar.)
| Attendance: |
Being-t/here is important. Attend class unless there is a good, documentable excuse. I reserve the right to lower your final grade one letter if you do not attend regularly or you are not prepared for class. I will give you one warning in writing.
| Texts for Course: |
| Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. trans. George A. Kennedy. (pb) Oxford UP |
| Derrida, Jacques. Dissemination. (pb) |
| Heidegger, Martin. Early Greek Thinking. (pb) |
| Isocrates. The Orations. (3 vols.) |
| Jarratt, Susan. Rereading the Sophists. Southern Illinois UP |
| Kerferd, The Sophistic Movement. (pb) |
| Neel, Jasper. Plato, Derrida, and Writing. (pb) |
| Nietzsche, Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks. (pb) |
| Poulakos, John. Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece. (cloth) |
| Sprague. The Older Sophists. South Carolina UP ... Out of Print! ... |
| Vitanza, Victor J. Negation, Subjectivity, and The History of Rhetoric. SUNY UP. |
(and numerous works at the copy center, across from the post office, in UTA Student Union)
| Some Histories of Rhetoric: |
I did not order any histories of rhetoric, but you can find them available in most libraries. You might want to look at ...
| Kennedy, George. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of NC P, 1980. |
| Ijsseling, Samuel. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Conflict: An Historical Survey. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976. |
| Conley, Thomas M. Rhetoric in the European Tradition. NY: Longman, 1990. |
| Vickers, Brian. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1988, 1990. |
| Covino, William A. The Art of Wondering: A Revisionist Return to the History of Rhetoric. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, Heinemann, 1988. |
| Some Books on Historiographies of Rhetorics: |
| Poulakos, Takis, ed. Rethinking the History of Rhetoric: Multidisciplinary Essays on the Rhetorical Tradition. Polemics Series. Boulder: Westview P, 1993. |
| Vitanza, Victor J., ed. Writing Histories of Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1994. |
| Works at Copy Center: |
I have tried to find what I think are a few of the important discussions of particular rhetors, their works, and concepts. There is obviously much more out there to read. In gathering these works, I have tried to save each of you time, make them easily accessible, etc. The numbers in the syllabus correspond to the ID numbers in my file for this seminar at the Copy Center.
| Syllabus: |
| Wk. 1 .....Introduction(s), with focus on Plato's "giving an account [logos] of self" and on Foucault's "technologies of the self" [#x] and "caring for self" [#x]. And with a focus on freedom of speech in antiquity, in relation to isegoria and parrhesia. |
| Wk. 2 .....accounts of (or accounting for) The History of Rhetoric: |
| Wk. 3 .....Presocratics: Anixamander and Heraclitus |
| Wk. 4 .....Presocratics: Heraclitus (condt.) and Parmenides |
For Parmenides, Nye, from ch. 1, Words of Power [#X]. Girard, Ch. 4, "Logos of Heraclitus..." [#X].
| Wk. 5 .....the Sophists: In General |
| Wk. 6 .....the Sophists: Gorgias |
| Wk. 7 .....the Sophists: Protagoras. |
| Wk. 8 .....the Sophists: Antiphon. |
| Wk. 9 ..... Plato: Gorgias; Phaedrus; Sophist |
| Wk. 10 ..... Plato: Plato, Bk. IX (The Republic) [#X]; Alcibiades 1 and 2 [#X] |
Wks. 11-12 ..... Isocrates: The Orations. |
Additional Readings for
wks. 11-12: Jaeger, chs. from Paideia [#X]; Marrou. ch. from Education in
Antiquity [#X]; Vitanza, Chaps. 3-4 on Isocrates in NSHR; T. Poulakos, Selections from his book Speaking for the Polis, forthcoming. Also, be
sure to read Ijsseling, Ch. 3, "Isocrates and the Power of Logos" (Philosophy and Rhetoric in Conflict).
[#X].
| Wk. 13 ..... Aristotle: Rhetoric [Kennedy's trans.], Poetics. |
| Wk. 14 ..... Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Politics |
Grimaldi, "Aristotle's Rhetoric" [#X]; Kinneavy, "William Grimaldi" [#X]; Havelock, Ch. 11, "Aristotle's Ethics" [#X]. From Nye, Ch. 3, Words of Power [#X].
| Wk. 15 ..... A Return to the Sophists (Feminist and/or Third Sophistic) |
| Wk. 16 ..... Final: Oral Summary Presentation of Major Project (to be evaluated as part of final grade). I want not only the paper to be turned in but also want a brief (say, 500-word) description of the paper. |
Victor
J. Vitanza
Victor
J. Vitanza Past Courses-Seminars
Rhetoric/Composition/Critical Theory HP
The ENGLISH HOME
PAGE