The Novels of Louise Erdrich:
|English 6339-501||Office Hrs: T/TH: 11-12:30 or by appt.|
|Instructor: Dr. Roemer||405 Carlisle Hall; 817-272-2729 voice mail|
|TH 6-9:50 p.m.||Please schedule all appts.; on voice mail, leave name and phone #.|
|Room TBAfirstname.lastname@example.org; www.uta.edu/english/roemer|
Winner of a National Book Critics Circle Award and many other awards, Louise Erdrich (1954 - ) is an internationally known contemporary American author. Although she is recognized as a poet, essayist, and children's fiction writer, she is best known for her North Dakota saga: to date eight novels consistently compared to Faulkner's Yoknapatawpha saga. For most of the class time we will focus on intense, book-by-book examinations of the novels. But these novels raise significant issues that go beyond the specifics of Erdrich's canon to question how scholars define gender, written genres, and authorship, and how they categorize literature. The latter question of literary placement is particularly relevant. Erdrich is consistently defined as a Native American or American Indian author, and yet consistently in interviews she rejects that categorization claiming that it tends to ghettoize American Indian authors. She prefers to be defined as an American author. Hence one of the motifs of the course will be the specific question of placing Erdrich, which, of course, raises the general questions of placing ethnic, women's, genre, and other "defined" forms of fiction. The course begins by placing Erdrich within the American Indian literature canon and by questioning that placement; it then proceeds to the book-by-book examinations, though the placement issue will recur throughout the course.
GOALS [AND MEANS]
1. An intensive study of seven of Erdrich's eight North Dakota Saga novels including all of her "reservation" or "Matchimanito" novels. [readings, class discussion, exams]
2. A selective introduction to Erdrich criticism [readings in Approaches to Teaching the Works of Louise Erdrich and in the course packet]
3. An brief introduction to American Indian literatures [Ruoff's American Indian Literatures and handouts]
4. An examination of issues relevant to fiction by Erdrich, American Indian novelists, and contemporary American novelists, in particular the placement issue noted above, but also questions about genre (e.g., written texts inspired by oral traditions), about gender (e.g., intersections of gender and culture), about structure and narrative voice (e.g., Erdrich's multiple narrators), about authorship (the implications of stages of Erdrich's collaborative writing with Michael Dorris), and about the ethics and politics of fiction labeled as Native American. [critical readings, class discussions, exams paper]
5. An opportunity to improve research writing skills [prospectus, paper]
6. An opportunity to improve oral discussion and presentation skills [class and small group discussions and presentations; note: class pedagogy includes lectures, class discussion, and small group discussion followed by informal group presentations that address questions assigned during the previous class
For specific means of assessment and grading, see Examinations, Paper, and Approximate Grading Weights, Warnings and Encouragement
Course Packet (CP) at Bird's Copies; Ruoff, American Indian Literatures; Sarris, Jacobs, and Giles., eds, Approaches to Teaching the Works of Louise Erdrich (A); see page numbers below; and novels by Erdrich: Love Medicine (1993 edition), Beet Queen, Tracks, Bingo Palace, Tales of Burning Love, Last Report of the Miracles at Little No Horse, Four Souls. Handouts distributed in class.
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOPICS, READINGS, PROSPECTUS, PAPER
A = Approaches; CP = Course Packet
Introds. to the Course, AIL, the Placement Issue, and Erdrich
Reading: Ruoff, American Indian Literatures ( 1-115); 8/25; 9/1
Roemer, "Introduction" (CP); Momaday,
"Man Made" (CP); Silko, "Language" (CP);
McWilliams, "Doubling" (158-69) (A); Papovich,
"Journey" (CP); Cook-Lynn, "American Indian
Fiction"(CP); Womack, " Introduction" (CP)
Readings: Beidler, "Erdrich" (CP); Erdrich, "Where" (CP);
Rainwater, "Reading" (CP)); in Approaches (A)Preface
(1-3), Introd. (5-7), Materials (11-20), "History"
(23-30), "Collaboration" (147-57); browse appnx.. 9/1, 8
From Short Story to Series: The Early North Dakota Saga Novels
Love (and Hate) Medicine [focus - 1934 - 1984 ] 9/15
Reading: Love Medicine (1984; 1993 ); (A): "Family" (77-82);
"Does Power Travel" (83-87); ""Identity" (170-74)
The Off-Rez Sagas, First Episodes (focus - 1948 - 1972) 9/22
Reading: The Beet Queen (1986); (A): "Reading" (175-82),
"Gender" (1983-90) [For other major episodes.
see Antelope Wife (1998) and The Master Butchers
Singing Club (2003).]
Take-Home Exam Questions Distributed 9/22
Turn in Exam / Reading Tracks / Initial Ideas on Paper [no class] 9/29
Tracking Historical Origins (focus 1912 - 1924) 10/6
Reading: Tracks (1988); (A): "Doubling" (158-69);
"Tracing" (58-67); Peterson, "History" (CP)
Contemporary Life On and Off the Rez
Gambling the Real (Estate/Heritage/Vision) (focus - early 1990s) 10/ 13
Reading: Bingo Palace (1994); (A): "This Ain't Real Estate"
Women Talk, Men (and women) Change (sometimes)
(focus - June 1994 - Aug. 1995, esp. Dec. 31- Jan. 5,
with flashbacks to the 1960s) 10/20
Reading: Tales of Burning Love (1996); (A): "Tracking" 118-29)
Distribute Take-Home Exam 10/20
Turn in Exam / Concentrated Work on Paper [no class] 10/27
Required Conferences on Papers, with Prospectus 11/3
Backtracking: Revisiting the Origins
A Report that Can Never be Last (focus 1910-1996) ` 11/10
Reading: Last Report (2001); (A): "Gender" (140-46)
Cross-Cultural Revenge and Healing (focus - mid-1920s) 11/17
Reading: Four Souls (2004); (A): "Tracking Fleur" (66-76)
Research Paper Due 12/1
Review for Final / Study Sheet Distributed 12/1
Third Examination 12/8
I will draw the take-home and final essay questions from the readings, lectures and discussions. My primary criteria for the essay questions are: (1) Does the essay directly address the questions? (It's often useful to use variations of the question to construct topic and thesis sentences.) (2) Is every claim supported convincingly with significant and relevant examples from Erdrich's novels, and, if relevant, examples and ideas from the criticism? The in-class final, which focuses on material after the second take-home, will be open book; I encourage students to prepare outlines for possible questions. All exams are graded anonymously; I use a numbering system.
Length: approximately 3,500-4,000 words (approximately 14-16 pages; plus works cited; MLA format); due date: December 1, 2005. The paper should demonstrate your ability: (1) to select a focus and argument that you can justify as being significant to readers; (2) to integrate your own ideas and the ideas of scholars and critics (at least six); i.e., enter the critical conversation about the text(s); (3) to support arguments adequately and to organize them in logical and convincing ways; (4) to master basic mechanics of writing (grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc.). The focus should be strongly influenced by the length requirement. Too broad a focus will invite a superficial paper; focusing too narrowly can lead to repetition. Students may wish to concentrate on one text or to do a comparative study. The comparisons can be between or among Erdrich's novels or involve comparisons with other authors (e.g., McWilliam's excellent essay in Approaches ). The methodological approach is open; for example, New Critical detailed readings, cultural, feminist, biographical, ethnic, postcolonial, or historical studies are all acceptable.
For the conference on November 3, I require students to bring a short prospectus that I can examine. Although the prospectus will be graded, it should not be perceived as a straight jacket. Major changes are appropriate if they will improve the quality of the paper. The prospectus (approximately 1 - 3 pages typed) must include:
1. A one-to-four sentence statement of the thesis that defines the primary question(s) addressed and the focus of the paper.
2. A one-to-four sentence statement of the significance of the thesis/question.
3. A one-to-five sentence statement of the anticipated method(s) used (e.g., biographical, feminist, ethnic studies, New Critical) and why the method(s) are appropriate.
4. A one-to-five sentence initial and tentative description of the organization of the paper.
5. A brief, short-title list that indicates the major critical sources (indicate any problems anticipated obtaining these sources).
Critical sources on Erdrich's fiction are abundant. Pages 17-20 of Approaches list many important examples (books, journals, essays, interviews, audiovisual materials); the editors complement these lists with the Works Cited section (245-58). The bibliographic sections of the Beidler and Rainwater essays in the Course Packet are also useful, as is the bibliography in Beidler and Barton's A Reader's Guide to the Novels of Louise Erdrich. Students interested in writing about Last Report and Four Souls will have some difficulty finding critical sources because both books are so new, especially Four Souls. But numerous reviews are available. Furthermore may of the issues and characters significant to these two recent novels are discussed in articles and chapters about the earlier novels (e.g., the implications of the "unrealistic" events or magical realism, narrative structure, narrative voice, the impact of tragic historic events, the import of family and community, survival issues, the powers of love, Nanapush, Fleur, Sister Leopolda, etc.).
The MultiCultural Collection on the second floor of the Central Library is an excellent place to search for written and Internet sources. One excellent general source is the Web site for the Association for the Study of American Indian Literatures (ASAIL): <http://oncampus.richmond.edu/faculty/asail>. Another useful initial site is <http://nativeauthor.com>.
Under normal circumstances, I do not accept late papers.
Approximate Grading Weights
First Take-Home 20%
Second Take-Home 20%
Third Exam 20%
Research Paper 40% [of which 5% is the prospectus]
Professors cannot drop students for excessive absences. If you plan to withdraw, you must follow Universities procedures; otherwise the computer will give you an F. Sept. 30 is the last day to drop with an automatic W. Thereafter the grade will be W or F for students withdrawing depending on their performance and attendance. Excessive absences will affect semester grades; each three unexcused absences lowers the semester grad by a half grade. In the past I have had few problems with plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty. For excellent guidelines on plagiarism, see chapter 2 of the MLA Handbook. I have little tolerance for plagiarism; University policies will be followed.
Consistent and constructive class participation and improvement can elevate semester grades significantly. Also I am very willing to work with students who have disabilities. At the beginning of the semester, these students should provide me with documentation authorized by the appropriate University office. Students seeking academic, personal, and social counseling should contact the Graduate Advisor and/or the Office of Student Success (817-272-6107).