Picture Page 3: Miscellaneous Sedimentary Features

Shown features are from the Newland Formation (Figs. 3/1 and 3/2) and the Prichard Formation (Figs. 3/3 and 3/4), both from the Mid-Proterozoic Belt basin. Newland Formation shales were deposited in comparatively shallow water, and those of the Prichard Formation in comparatively deep water. For further information consult a publication from 1990 (Schieber, J., 1990, Sedimentary structures, textures, and depositional settings of shales from the Lower Belt Supergroup, Mid-Proterozoic, Montana, U.S.A.: In: Microstructure of Fine-Grained Sediments: From Mud to Shale, (eds. R.H. Bennett, W.R. Bryant, M.H. Hulbert), p. 101-108, Springer Verlag). Photos are low resolution for faster loading. Click on the image to get a larger, high resolution picture.

Figure 3/1: Photomicrograph of a shale with suspended coarse sand grains (Newland Formation). Material such as this may form lenses within gray dolomitic shales. To have a clay matrix in what appears to be a migrating bedform (starved ripple?) is puzzling. The clay particles of the matrix and the sand grains are not hydraulic equivalents, so how did they get deposited together in these lenses? One possible explanation could be that we started out with clay aggregates or rip-up clasts that traveled together with the sand grains, and that the margins of shale clasts became indistinguishable due to compaction and diagenetic overprint.
Figure 3/2: Photomicrograph of gray dolomitic shale (Newland Formation). Shows faint internal banding due to variations in dolomite content (dolomite rich bands are lighter). The lighter (dolomitic) bands have been interpreted as distal mud tempestites (Schieber, J., 1989, Facies and origin of shales from the Mid-Proterozoic Newland Formation, Belt basin, Montana, U.S.A.: Sedimentology, v. 36, p. 203-219).

Figure 3/3: Photomicrograph of graded silt/mud couplets in the Prichard Formation. Aside of grading and basal load structures (micro-flame structures), these layers are essentially featureless. In contrast to silt/mud couplets of the Newland Formation they show no indications of wave or current action. They also show none of the features described from muddy turbidites. They may actually be the deposits of short lived lutite flows, possibly induced by storms on the shelf or by river floods.
Figure 4/4: Photomicrograph of wavy-lenticular silt laminae in the Prichard Formation. The lenticular nature and sharp lower and upper boundaries are suggestive of bedload transport over the sea bed. They could be the result of episodic sediment reworking by weak bottom currents.

 

Back to Pictures on Pyrite Ooids: Enigmatic Particles of Uncertain Origin

Back to Pictures on Microbial Mat Features in Proterozoic Shales

More Pictures on Silica Filled Cysts in the Chattanooga Shale

More Pictures on Sculpting of Muddy Bottoms, Erosion Surfaces and Ripples

More Pictures on Bioturbation in the Chattanooga Shale

Students

The Puzzler

Shale News

Shale Photos

Sequence Stratigraphy in
the Chattanooga Shale

Classes etc.

Curriculum Vitae

List of Publications

Bioturbation in
the Chattanooga Shale

 

Back to Schieber Home

Back to Geology Home

© Jürgen Schieber, UTA Department of Geology
Last updated: March 12, 2001.