1.1.1. About Your Instructor
About Your Instructor

Instructor's Contact Information: 
Instructor:
Emily Spence-Almaguer, MSWPh.D.
Office Number: 
Building B, Room 117: Community Services Center
Office Telephone:
817–272–6199 (Email is preferred)
Email:
spence@uta.edu
Office Hours: 
 Wednesdays 10-12

Instructor Response to Emails

  • All emails sent between Tuesday at noon and Thursday at noon will receive a reply by Thursday at 5 P.M. 
  • All emails sent between Thursday at noon and Tuesday at noon will receive a reply by Tuesday at 5 P.M.
  • For individual or personal concerns, please send the instructor an email. 
  • For general questions regarding course content or clarification of assignments, please post a question to the Course FAQ's discussion board. 
  • For all WebCT-related questions please contact the UTA Office of Information Technology.
  • For questions about Microsoft products, please contact Microsoft online help services.

About Your Instructor:

 

Biography

I have been an Assistant Professor at UTA since 2001 and served as Co-Director of the Community Services Center from 2005 to 2008 and have returned to that role this Fall (2009). I completed my Bachelors and Masters Degree in Social Work from Florida State University in Tallahassee, FL, and my Ph.D. in Social Welfare at Florida International University in Miami, FL. I spent 10 years working as a social worker and administrator in the victim services field, specializing in stalking, sexual violence, and domestic violence. I successfully obtained many state and federal grants during that time. I have also served as a reviewer for the U.S. Department of Justice Violence Against Women grants program, and have been a reviewer and Chairperson for all of the criminal justice–related state grants that are submitted through the North Central Texas Council of Governments Criminal Justice Planning Committee.

Research Interests

My research interests include program evaluation, homelessness, poverty, community assessment, and interpersonal violence. In addition to this class, I teach Violence in the Family, Research Methods, Qualitative Research, Community and Administrative Practice, Generalist Macro Practice, and Social Statistics.

A link to the instructor's UTA homepage external site will open in a new window

Faculty Profile external site will open in a new window

 
    CDE Logo



1.1.2. About Your Course
About Your Course
syllabusAbout Your Course:  
Course Number
SOCW 6386-001
Section Number
001
Course Title
Grant Proposal Development Seminar
Time/Place of Class Meetings
Asynchronous online course
WebCT URL
http://webct.uta.edu/

WebCT Address

 
     CDE Logo


1.1.3. Description of Course Content
Description of Course Content
syllabusDescription of Course Content:  

Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS)

4.5 Social Work Practice

Social work practice content is anchored in the purposes of the social work profession and focuses on strengths, capacities, and resources of client systems in relation to their broader environments. Students learn practice content that encompasses knowledge and skills to work with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. This content includes engaging clients in an appropriate working relationship, identifying issues, problems, needs, resources, and assets; collecting and assessing information; and planning for service delivery. It includes using communication skills, supervision, and consultation. Practice content also includes identifying, analyzing, and implementing empirically based interventions designed to achieve client goals; applying empirical knowledge and technological advances; evaluating program outcomes and practice effectiveness; developing, analyzing, advocating, and providing leadership for policies and services; and promoting social and economic justice. (CSWE, pp. 35-36).

Catalogue Description of Course Content

Grant proposal development is a fundamental method of accessing funds and developing new programs in the social service arena. In this class, students will identify key funding opportunities in their fields of interest and will write a proposal using an actual federal application. The majority of the course will be devoted to the development of the skills and knowledge necessary to produce a competitive proposal. These include, but are not limited to: a) needs and capacities assessment, b) program development, c) strategic planning, d) budgeting, e) evaluation, and f) community collaboration.

 
     CDE Logo


1.1.4. Expanded Description of Course Content
Expanded Description of Course Content

syllabusExpanded Description of Course Content: 

Online Components

This is an asynchronous online course, meaning that it will be self-directed in your own time frame each week. Discussion board postings will be due by Friday at noon for the weeks they are assigned and all other assignments are due Monday at noon for the weeks they are assigned.

The online components of the course will include

  1. hyper-linked “lecture” material addressing course content;
  2. WebCT bulletin board postings for collaborative learning, peer assistance, and instructor support;
  3. collaborative team peer review of grant proposals using the track changes functions of Microsoft Word; and
  4. submission of course assignments via WebCT.

Offline Components

Offline components will include

  1. researching the needs of a target population in a specified geographic area, as well as the currently available services in that region;
  2. visiting a funding information library (there are two in the North Texas metroplex and many others across the nation);
  3. conducting an interview with a grant writer.
  4. Three optional face to face  "coffee shop" discussions with peers and the instructor.

 
    CDE Logo



1.1.5. Applied and Collaborative Learning
Emphasis On Applied and Collaborative Learning
syllabusEmphasis On Applied and Collaborative Learning:  

This course includes some instructor-based content, but the primary emphasis is on applied and collaborative learning. Grant writing is a skill that is developed only through practice. This course requires substantial efforts on your part to gather relevant data and produce a grant proposal that would be competitive in the realm of government funding opportunities.

The collaborative nature of the course is also instrumental in this applied learning experience. Not only will you learn by “doing”, you will also learn by “helping.” Through the review team experiences, you will become exposed to other grant opportunities and will serve as a “teacher”, “editor” and general helper to your team members. Being a review team member will require that you participate in a timely and responsive manner. These teams are highly successful when everyone contributes; thus part of your grade will come from an assessment of your role as a team member.

 
     CDE Logo


1.1.6. Learning Outcomes and Objectives
Learning Outcomes and Objectives
syllabusLearning Outcomes and Objectives:  

Student Learning Outcomes

By the end of this course, students will be able to:

  1. Identify and locate suitable grant-funding opportunities for their individual substantive areas of interest.
  2. Construct a federal grant proposal for a minimum of $100,000.
  3. Obtain experience evaluating and reviewing grant applications. 
  4. Apply their knowledge of diverse populations, needs assessment, capacity building, program development and planning, evidence-based practice, budgeting, evaluation, and community collaboration for the purpose of grant proposal development.
  5. Identify methods of promoting the competitiveness and fundability of grant applications.
  6. Develop programs and evaluation plans that are culturally-appropriate and comply with human subjects research guidelines.

Educational Objectives Addressed

SOCW 6386 addresses the following MSSW Community and Administrative Practice Objectives:

  1. Build on generalist skills in community assessment to design an intervention strategy including mission, goals, objectives, budget, logic model, and evaluation.
  2. Identify, critically evaluate, and apply appropriate, evidence-informed interventions at the agency or community level.
  3. Critically analyze and apply a variety of community and administrative theories to practice.
  4. Demonstrate skills in ethical and empowerment-based social work practice, taking into account the impact of race, gender, sexual orientation, ability, culture, religion, national origin and other client characteristics in organizations, and communities.
  5. Design practice evaluation activities to improve human service interventions in organizations and communities.
  6. Demonstrate ability to integrate micro and macro practice, policy, and research into their area of service delivery in order to enhance client well-being.
  7. Prepare to engage in life-long learning and activities to update and improve  professional knowledge and skills.

This course relates to and advances the objectives by developing a federal grant application that incorporates intervention theories and strategies, models of evidence-based practice, ethical issues as they relate to human participants in intervention research, program evaluation, and discussions of client and community impacts (objectives 1 through 6). Through funding library visits and interviews with grant writers, students become exposed to professional development opportunities and models of community practice consultation (objective 7). 

 
     CDE Logo


1.1.7. Requirements
Requirements
syllabusRequirements:  

Prerequisite

The prerequisite for this course is SOCW 6371 Community and Administrative Practice. Students who do not have this prerequisite (e.g. those in the Direct Practice track) must submit a written request to the instructor and provide justification for his/her ability to meet the demands of the class and specification as to how the course will support his/her career goals. Prerequisite: SOCW 6325; SOCW 6326 or concurrent enrollment; or SOCW 6336 or concurrent enrollment. CAP students: SOCW 6371 or concurrent enrollment.

Required Textbook

textbook coverThe Only Grant Writing Book You'll Ever Need:
Top grant writers and grant givers share their secrets
(2nd ed.).
Karsh, E. & Fox, A.S.
New York: Carrol & Graf (2006)
ISBN 10: 0-78671-754-8

Software Application and Skills

All students must utilize Microsoft Word 2007 to create and submit their assignments. This software is part of the Microsoft Office™ suite, which is available  to UTA students at a special discounted price through the UTA computer store.

Technical Skills

Students are also required to have sufficient technical skills to do the following:

  1. Use the track changes and comment features of Microsoft Word.
  2. Create spreadsheets in MS Excel and use basic formulas in spreadsheet cells.
  3. Create charts and graphs in MS Word, Excel, and/or PowerPoint.
  4. Convert charts and graphs to image files (JPEG or GIF) and import into MS Word.
  5. Locate and retrieve social indicator data from public web sites such as the United States Census, Texas Education Agency, and others. 
  6. Upload assignments into WebCT and files into WebCT discussion boards.
 
     CDE Logo


1.1.8. Technical Requirements and Support
Technical Issues and Support
syllabusTechnical Issues and Support:  

Applications

WebCT™

Students will actively utilize WebCT to access required reading, journal articles, and other course assignments—as well as to communicate with peers and the professor throughout the semester.

Students must have access to a computer with Internet access and a Web browser compatible with WebCT Campus Edition External link opens content in a new window. to be able to participate fully in the WebCT online environment. After you login to WebCT, you can check your browser for compatibility with WebCT by clicking on the "Check Browser" link in the dark blue bar at the top of your "myWebCTpage." If you need more technical information about your browser, go to the Browser Tuneup Page External link opens content in a new window., linked here and on the Check Browser page.

Students will also need a UTA NetID and password to login to their WebCT courses.

Microsoft Office™

The instructor of SOCW 6386 uses the "track changes" feature of MS Word when correcting papers; therefore, in order to review the instructor's comments on your papers, students will need MS Word installed on their computers. Students in SOCW 6386 will also benefit from access to MS Excel™ and PowerPoint™ while working on class projects.

Adobe Reader™

link to Adobe's web site where you can download the Adobe Reader External link opens content in a new window. PDF files require Adobe Reader™ to open. Download this free application if it is not already installed on your computer.

Check this out!Special Student Pricing for Office Software

Students can purchase a copy of the most recent version of Microsoft Office™ at a reduced student price from UTA's OIT Computer Store External site will open in a new window..

Technical Support

UTA's Office of Information Technology (OIT) offers technical support for students, including problems with logging in to the course or passwords. However, if you need help with any course content, including assignments, quizzes, tests, or the organization of the course in general, please contact your instructor.

Contact the OIT Help Desk:

  • Phone: (817) 272 -2208
  • Fax: (817) 272-2063
  • helpdesk@uta.edu External site will open in a new window.
  • Physical location: 102A Central Library

Other OIT Services

Go to OIT's Web site External site will open in a new window. to view the full range of technical services offered to UTA students, including MavSpace External site will open in a new window., a free online resource for publishing and file storage.

 
     CDE Logo


1.1.9. Navigating Your Course
Navigating Your Course
navigationNavigating Your Course:  

On the Homepage, there are icons for:

  • Syllabus and Calendar
  • Course Content
  • Communication Tools
  • Grades and Progress

Course Menu

There is a Course Menu with a list of available sections and features on the left side of the Homepage; the same menu appears in the other areas of the course, allowing you to easily navigate to any area of the course without returning to the Homepage.

Bread Crumbs

Beneath the course name there is a trail of "bread crumbs" — a running list of the links you have used to get to the page you are on. You can click on any of these links to return to any page on your path.

Action Menu

The Action Menu appears above every page of the Syllabus and Course Content areas of the course. The Action Menu includes icons for these tools:

  1. Go to the table of contents
  2. Previous page
  3. Next page
  4. Retrace the path
  5. Refresh this page from the server

Other helpful features in your WebCT course include:

Assignments

Some instructors list course assignments in the Assignments area of WebCT in addition to the Syllabus or Course Content areas. Your instructor may post Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or other documents to the Assignments area of WebCT, and you might be required to download documents to your hard drive and, later, upload completed assignments to WebCT using upload tools in Assignments.

The link to Assignments can be found on the Course Menu on the left side of WebCT.

The WebCT Calendar

  • View scheduled events, deadlines and due dates
  • Add private entries (only you can view them)
  • Create a printable list of entries (deadlines, due dates, etc.) by selecting the "Compile Entries" link above the calendar
  • New events pop up when you access (or refresh) the calendar

Print course materials

  • Accessible either from the Syllabus and Calendar icon on the Homepage or from the Course Menu.
  • Allows you to "compile" pages into one document for printing.
  • Or you can choose to simply print a single page as needed (e.g. the Course Outline in the Syllabus to have a handy reference of each session's key activities).

Hyperlinks

External site will open in a new window

  • This icon external site will open in a new window appears immediately after links to an external site that are designed to open in a new window. When you click on the link, a new window will open.
    • You can easily return to WebCT by either closing or minimizing the new window.

Tabbed browsing and hyperlinks

  • If you are using a tabbed browser such as Mozilla's Firefox external site will open in a new window or Internet Explorer 7.0 external site will open in a new window a link to an external site may open in a new tab rather than a new window depending on the settings in your browser.
  • If the external site opens in a new tab, simply return to the tab you were using for WebCT before you clicked on the external link.

Course content will open in a new window

  • This icon course content will open in a new window appears after course content that is linked so that it will open in a new window.
  • This content could be MS Word, MS Excel, or PDF files that you can open and then save to your hard drive. It also could be an image, table, or other graphical content that relates to the content you are studying.
  • You can easily return to WebCT by either closing or minimizing the new window.

Links that open within WebCT

 
     CDE Logo


1.1.10. Course Outline
Course Outline
Course outlineCourse Outline:  

SOCW 6386 FALL 2009

 

Course Outline
Session Date Topics & Readings Assignments Due
1 August 24–28
  • Introduction to grant writing
  • Review syllabus

Discussion Board 1: Post introduction answers and completed table of personal strengths by Friday at 12PM

2 August 31-Sept 4th
  • Identifying potential sources of funding
  • Text: Lessons 1–2, pp. 3–35
  • Appendix 5 & 6, pp. 311–368
Discussion Board 2: Post description of an agency that you would like to use as your applicant organization by Friday at 12PM
3 September 7-11
  • Funding Information Library Site Visit

 

Discussion Board 3: What was your favorite resource at the Funding Information Library and Why? Due Friday at noon.
4 September 14-18
  • Reviewing RFP’s and previously funded programs associated with each RFP
  • Text: Lessons 3, pp. 36–54
  • Linking RFP to the applicant organizations, identifying opportunities for collaboration
  • Text: Lesson 4 & Funders Roundtable, pp. 55–98
  • Lesson 9, pp. 149–160
Discussion Board 4: Describe at least one RFP that you would like to consider using for this class and discuss its pros and cons by Friday at noon.  
5 September 21-25
  • Assessing needs and capacities
  • Text: Lessons 5 & 6, pp. 99–126
  • Optional: Coffee Shop chat with instructor and peers (bring your RFP's; tentative date is 9/22 at 9AM, location TBA)
Discussion Board 5: Describe another RFP you considered using for this class and tell us which one you would use. Due Friday at noon.
6 September 28 to Oct 2
  • Establishing goals and objectives
  • Developing a Logic Model
  • Choosing an evidence-based model
  • Text: Lesson 7 (pp. 127–136)
Discussion Board: 6: Tell us about the data you wish you could find but can't seem to locate. Due Friday at noon.
7 October 5-9
  • Developing a Work Plan
  • Text: Lesson 8, pp. 137–148
  • Appendix 1 & 2, pp. 281–286
Part One—Draft for peer review by Monday at noon
8 October 12-16
  • Developing an Evaluation Plan
  • Text: Lesson 10, pp. 161–171
Part One—Final submission by Monday at Noon.
9 October 19-23
  • Establishing organizational capacity,  developing job descriptions, a sustainability plan & organizational charts
  • Text: Lessons 12 & 13, pp. 185–199
Discussion Board 7: Tell us about a pilot project or evidence-based practice that might work for your proposal. Due Friday at noon.
10 October 26-30
  • Developing a budget and budget narrative
  • Text: Lesson 11, pp. 172-184
  • Optional Coffee Shop Chat with Peers and Instructor Tuesday 10/27 at 9AM, location TBA
Part Two—Draft for peer review by Monday at noon.
11 November 2-6
  • Establishing community support via letters of support or commitment, MOU’s and MOA’s; putting together the abstract & appendices.
  • Branding your project
  • Text: Lesson 14 & Funders Roundtable II, pp. 200–246
Part Two—Final submission by Monday at noon.
12 Nov 9-13
  • Developing small foundation proposals
  • Text: Lessons 15, 16 &
  • Funders Roundtable III, pp. 247–280
Part Three—Draft for peer review by Monday at noon.
13 November 16-20
  • Being a grant writer in the metroplex
  • Optional Coffee shop chat with peers and instructor Tuesday 11/17 at 9AM, location TBA
Discussion Board 8: Interview with a grant writer due Friday at noon
14 November 23-25 Mock grant review Part Three—Final submission and Full Proposal for mock review Monday at noon.
15 November 30-Dec 4

Pseudo "Grant Awards” and course evaluation

Submit mock review scores and Review Team peer evaluation by Monday at noon.
 
     CDE Logo


1.2.1. Federal Grant Application
Federal Grant Application
AssignmentsFederal Grant Application:  

outcomesLearning Outcomes 2, 4, and 6

Students will identify a Request for Proposal (RFP) that has been issued by a federal organization within the previous four years. The RFP must be related to social work practice (macro or micro) and have a funding cap of $100,000 or higher. The student must locate a suitable applicant organization or consortium and craft a proposal on behalf of that entity. It is not necessary for the proposal to be formally submitted by the organization, but it needs to be prepared as though this was the intent. 

In order to promote consistency, a reasonable workload, and fairness, students will adapt their RFP according to a “standard” grant proposal model used for this class. This model will include the following 3 components: 

  1. Assessment of Needs & Capacities, Goals, Objectives and Logic Model;
  2. Work Plan, Evaluation Plan, and Time Task Sheet; and
  3. Organizational Capacity, Budget Spreadsheet, Budget Narrative, Abstract, Memoranda of Understanding and Letters of Support/Commitment/Intent. 

Students will need to identify how the components of their RFP match up to the class assignment grading criteria. The selected RFP’s will be used to guide the program development for the project, but the application itself will follow the assignment instructions. 

 
     CDE Logo


1.2.2. Grant Review and Scoring
Grant Review and Scoring
AssignmentsGrant Review and Scoring:  

outcomesLearning Outcomes 3 and 5

Students will organize their full grant proposal into a complete final document and post it on the WebCT discussion board. Students will review and score the applications of students who were not on their assigned review team. Students will provide written feedback and quantitatively score each proposal. The instructor will compile these comments and scores and provide them to each proposal author. The highest scoring grants will be posted on WebCT and will receive a “Virtual” award. 

 
     CDE Logo


1.2.3. Review Team
Review Team

AssignmentsReview Team: 

outcomesLearning Outcomes 3 and 5

Students will work in groups of 3-4 students as part of a peer review team. For each section of the grant proposal, students will email a draft copy to members of their peer review team as well as post a draft copy on their review team discussion board by noon on Monday of the week it is due. Sending the drafts out using two different mechanisms helps to reduce the likelihood of technical problems.  Review team members will provide editorial comments using the track changes feature in Microsoft Word, and will then send it back to the author using email and the discussion board by Friday at noon.

The review team serves two key purposes:

  1. to improve the quality of student’s proposals, and
  2. to expose students to multiple RFP’s and styles of responding to them. 

Students must retain the track changes comments and markings and submit them to the instructor in order to receive a peer review grade. 

Each peer review is worth 40 points and will be graded according to the following criteria:

  • 20 points for completeness and timeliness of draft submission
  • 20 points for quality of feedback and timely return of draft to author (and discussion board)

Additionally, review team members will be asked to evaluate each other and each member will receive up to 20 points for the averaged score by their peers.

 
    CDE Logo



1.2.4. Interview with a Grant Writer
Interview with a Grant Writer

AssignmentsInterview with Grant Writer: 

outcomesLearning Outcomes 1 and 5

Each student should locate an individual who has successfully attained at least one government grant. You will conduct an interview with that individual and post your interview notes using the assignment template on WebCT for the full class to review on the discussion board.

 
    CDE Logo



1.2.5. Visit to the Funding InformationCenter
Visit to the Funding InformationCenter

AssignmentsVisit to the Funding Information Center: 

outcomesLearning Outcomes 1 and 5

In order to become familiar with non-governmental sources of funding, students must visit a funding information library (there are two in the North Texas Metroplex). While there, students should become familiar with their electronic funding databases, continuing education opportunities, and libraries. A summary of this visit should be uploaded into the assignment portal using the assignment template.

 
    CDE Logo



1.2.6. Discussion Board Posting and Responses
Discussion Board Posting and Responses

AssignmentsDiscussion Board Questions and Answers: 

outcomesLearning Outcomes 1– 6

In order to facilitate collaborative learning, students should make use of the discussion board functions in WebCT. During weeks that postings are assigned, students will be asked to respond to a question or provide some information about themselves or their projects. It is also expected that students will provide some follow-up responses to peer's postings within one week of the initial posting due date.  Scores for Discussion Board postings will be based on both the quality of assigned postings, as well as the extent to which students participated by providing useful and supportive feedback to peers.

 
    CDE Logo



1.2.7. Grading Policy
Grading Policy
gradesGrading Policy:  

Assignments

SOCW 6386 Grading Policy
Assignment Points
Team member evaluation (average of peer's scores) 20
Funding Information Library Site Visit     50
Federal Proposal, Part 1: Statement of Need, Goals and Objectives, and Logic Model 200
Federal Proposal, Part 2: Work Plan, Evaluation Plan, and Time Task Sheet 200
Federal Proposal, Part 3: Organizational Capacity, Organizational Chart, Budget Spreadsheet, Budget Narrative, Letters of Support or Commitment, Memoranda of Understanding and Abstract 200
Review Team Participation (3 at 40 points each)  120
Mock Review: Upload of complete proposal, scoring and feedback of peer proposals 50
Interview with a grant writer 50
Discussion Board Postings (7 @ 25 pts each, excludes #8 interview with grant writer) 70
Participation in discussion board dialogue (5 pts per week @ 8 weeks ) 40
TOTAL POINTS 1000

Grading Scale

SOCW 6386 Grading Scale
A 900 – 1000 points
B 800 – 899 points
C 700 – 799 points
D 600 – 699 points       

Late Submission Policy

Turning in assignments late is detrimental to the collaborative nature of this course, and makes it difficult for students to maintain the pace of the coursework and complete the class on time. Therefore, points will be deducted for late assignments according to the following timeline:

Late Submission Table
Time Past Deadline Points Deducted
1 to 8 hours 3
9 to 24 hours 5
25 to 48 hours 10
Every 24 hours thereafter (i.e., 49 hours +) An additional 3 points per day

Example of a Late Submission 

An assignment that is 5 days late will have 19 points deducted: 10 points for the first 2 days (5 points multiplied times 2 days) plus 3 for each additional day (3 points multiplied times 3 days) equals 19 points.

 
     CDE Logo


1.3.1. Attendance and Active Learning
Attendance and Active Learning
syllabusAttendance and Active Learning:  

SOCW 6386 is an online course—students are not required to attend any face-to-face classes. However, students are expected to fully participate in the class through engagement in discussion forums and team-based projects, and by completing assignments and exercises. The emphasis of this course is on active learning where students accept responsibility to engage with each other, their instructor, and course content towards the goal of mastering learning outcomes set forth in course material.

Check this out!Go to UTA's active learning portal for students to read what UTA students are saying about active learning at UTA and how it enhances higher order thinking skills. 

 
     CDE Logo


1.3.2. Drop Policy
Drop Policy
syllabusDrop Policy:  

If you chose to drop the class, it is your responsibility to complete the paperwork according to the University’s schedule. Not doing so may result in a failing grade.

 
     CDE Logo


1.3.3. Americans With Disabilities Act
Americans With Disabilities Act
syllabusAmericans With Disabilities Act:  

The University of Texas at Arlington is on record as being committed to both the spirit and letter of federal equal opportunity legislation; reference Public Law 92-112-The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended. With the passage of federal legislation entitled Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), pursuant to section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, there is renewed focus on providing this population with the same opportunities enjoyed by all citizens.

As a faculty member, I am required by law to provide "reasonable accommodations" to students with disabilities, so as not to discriminate on the basis of that disability. Student responsibility primarily rests with informing faculty of their need for accommodation and in providing authorized documentation through designated administrative channels.  Information regarding specific diagnostic criteria and policies for obtaining academic accommodations can be found at www.uta.edu/disability. Also, you may visit the University of Texas at Arlington's Office for Students with Disabilities external site will open in a new window either online or in room 102 of University Hall, or call them at (817) 272-3364.

 
     CDE Logo


1.3.4. Academic Integrity and Proper use of Source Material for Grant Proposal
Academic Integrity and Proper use of Source Material for Grant Proposal

syllabusAcademic Integrity: 

It is the philosophy of The University of Texas at Arlington that academic dishonesty is a completely unacceptable mode of conduct and will not be tolerated in any form. All persons involved in academic dishonesty will be disciplined in accordance with University regulations and procedures. Discipline may include suspension or expulsion from the University.

"Scholastic dishonesty includes but is not limited to cheating, plagiarism, collusion, the submission for credit of any work or materials that are attributable in whole or in part to another person, taking an examination for another person, any act designed to give unfair advantage to a student or the attempt to commit such acts." (Regents’ Rules and Regulations, Series 50101, Section 2.2)

In the "real" world, several people usually collaborate on the writing of one grant.  In this class, however, the grant proposal is an assignment-- which means that all parts of it need to have been written by student submitting the paper.  APA style must be used to cite all source material. You may quote material from the internet, professional literature and agency brochures/reports, but must do so using APA guidelines.  Excessive use of quoted material should be avoided however.

 
    CDE Logo



1.3.5. Student Support Services
Student Support Services Available
syllabusStudent Support Services Available:  

The University of Texas at Arlington supports a variety of student success programs to help you connect with the University and achieve academic success. These programs include learning assistance, developmental education, advising and mentoring, admission and transition, and federally funded programs. Students requiring assistance academically, personally, or socially should contact the Office of Student Success Programs at 817-272-6107 for more information and appropriate referrals.

You may also go to UTA's Student Success web site for more information.

 
     CDE Logo


1.3.6. Librarian to Contact
Librarian to Contact
syllabusLibrarian to Contact:  

John Dillard is the Social Work librarian and holds office hours in the E-Library on the first floor of Building A.

John Dillard's web site provides contact information and links to useful information for social work students.

 
     CDE Logo


1.3.7. E-Culture Policy
E-Culture Policy
syllabusE-Culture Policy:  

The University of Texas at Arlington has adopted the University email address as an official means of communication with students. Through the use of email, UT-Arlington is able to provide students with relevant and timely information, designed to facilitate student success. In particular, important information concerning registration, financial aid, payment of bills, and graduation may be sent to students through email.

All students are assigned an email account and information about activating and using it is available on the MavMail Homepage. New students (first semester at UTA) are able to activate their email account 24 hours after registering for courses. There is no additional charge to students for using this account, and it remains active as long as a student is enrolled at UT-Arlington. Students are responsible for checking their email regularly.

 
     CDE Logo


1.4.1. Bibliography
Bibliography
booksBibliography:  
  • 'Charitable choice' still in flux as religious organizations compete for treatment grants. (2005). Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly, 17(33), 1-5.
  • Ford, D. (2006). Webster's new world grant writing handbook. Technical Communication, 53(1), 118-119.
  • Hopkins, K. M., & Hyde, C. (2002). The human service managerial dilemma: New expectations, chronic challenges, and old solutions. Administration in Social Work, 26(3), 1-15.
  • Kerney, C. A. (2005). Inside the mind of a grant reader. Technology & Learning, 25(11), 62-66.
  • Surko, M., Pasti, L. W., Whitlock, J., & Benson, D. A. (2006). Selecting statewide youth development outcome indicators. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 12, S72-S78.
 
     CDE Logo