FACULTY SENATE MEETING
Minutes
University Center, Concho Room
February 6, 2002
Attendance:
Rasheed, A., Nussbaum, C., Kribs-Zaleta, C.,
Depken, C., Maher, D., Reinhartz, D., Patrick, D., Barrett, E., Estes, E.,Liu,
H., Courtney, H., Amster, H.,Clark, ,J., Porter, Fincher, L., Eakin, M., Jones,
M.E., Lehmann, P.,Elmasri, R.,Burke, S., Hunter, S., Maizlish, S. (Secretary),
Kleiser, S., Wilding, T., Ingram, T., Balsam,W., President R. Witt,
Provost G. Wright, Vice President D. Dunn, Assistant Vice President M.
Moore, and Chair T. Chrzanowski.
Call to Order:
2:35 p.m. Senate Chair Thomas Chrzanowski called
the Senate to order.
Approval of Minutes:
The minutes of the December 12, 2001 meeting
were approved unanimously.
Remarks by the Chair:
The Chair had no remarks.
Remarks by the President:
President Witt updated the Senate on UTA support
for mass transit in the May election. A
list of issues is being prepared for the upcoming legislative session. Planning efforts for the new Science
Building is on schedule. One of the new
apartment buildings is ahead of schedule; the other is slightly behind. President Witt is traveling to Washington,
D.C. on a monthly basis to promote funding from federal sources. Researchers are asked to notify him as early
as possible in the grant-writing process of any upcoming federal grant
submissions so that groundwork can be laid in D.C. to support UTA
proposals.
Remarks by the Provost:
Provost Wright reported that his office had just completed Promotion and Tenure reviews and indicated that he was very impressed with both the level of preparation and the quality of our faculty.
Sen. Liu asked President Witt for clarification of his request for early notification on grant submissions. He restated that the earlier he is aware of upcoming grants, the more likely he can seek support for them on his monthly trips to D.C. Grants written within normal timeframes will be in process in plenty of time to allow him to lobby on their behalf.
Sen. Reinhartz asked President Witt if an Arlington light rail stop was under consideration in the public transportation initiative. President Witt advised that a one-quarter cent tax increase will be on the May ballot in Arlington. These funds would include a sum for a study of potential rail service to Arlington. Preliminary plans would link Arlington to the Dallas-Fort Worth rail line by bus service.
Sen. Elmasri asked Provost Wright the ratio of Promotion and Tenure proposals received to those approved. The Chair advised that these would be made public at the next meeting.
Sen. Elmasri asked how many Faculty Development Leaves are to be awarded this year. President Witt advised that fifteen were slated for this academic year, and that plans to expand to twenty in the future were in place. He expressed concern that the application rate is so low, and encouraged more faculty to submit leave proposals. The Administration is committed to funding deserving proposals, and will support the transition to funding 20 proposals for next year.
Chair Chrzanowski suggested to President Witt that he obtain a list of pending grant submissions from the office of Sponsored Projects. President Witt advised that he does receive such a list, and uses it regularly, but that some proposals have been coming in so close to the due date that there has been no opportunity to seek support at the federal level.
Sen. Liu asked if Faculty Development Leaves could be used
to remain on campus and conduct research with no teaching responsibilities. President Witt advised that this was
possible.
Committee Reports:
The
Council of Faculty Senates: Sen. Porter advised
that UTA representatives will attend the next meeting in March.
Equity:
Had no report, but is up to date on their projects.
Academic
Freedom and Tenure:
Sen. Priest reported that a preliminary draft of the Academic
Receivership Policy was available as a handout and asked senators to review
this document for discussion at the March 6th meeting.
The Chair urged senators to give this issue
their full attention and forward comments to Sen. Priest.
Operating
Procedures:
Proposed that senators be elected in January, rather than
September. An amendment to the Bylaws
was proposed to allow two representatives to attend the Texas Council of
Faculty Senates. A vote on these issues
will be taken in March.
Research
& Development:
Sen. Eakin reported that a review of apportionment has been completed,
and that two departments that currently have two senators should have only
one. He also suggested that a simple
computer program be developed to review apportionment annually.
The Chair expressed his thanks to R&D for
their hard work on this review and advised that there was no model in the
Bylaws for annual reapportionment.
A motion was made by Sen. Courtney and seconded
by Sen. Amster to accept the report of the R&D Committee. The motion passed unanimously.
A motion was made by Sen. Courtney to use these
figures to reapportion the Senate immediately at the next election. Sen. Maizlish suggested that the motion be
amended to include a provision for annual reapportionment prior to the election
of senators. Sen. Courtney accepted the
amendment of his motion.
Sen. Rasheed suggested that rather than going
through OIT, departments should provide numbers of faculty at the beginning of
each semester. The Chair advised that
department staff often do not understand eligibility rules of the Senate, and
therefore provide inaccurate counts.
Sen. Courtney retracted his acceptance of the
amendment by Sen. Maizlish. It was
clarified that departments with 0-22 faculty members have one senator, those
with 23-45 faculty have two senators, and those with 45 or more members have
three senators.
Sen. Amster reminded senators that apportionment
was a separate issue from changing term dates and suggested using the figures
available one month before elections to apportion senators.
The Chair clarified the motion on the floor that
the Senate implement the recommendations of the R&D Committee immediately
for the upcoming elections. The motion
was passed unanimously. The Chair will
formally notify the Provost’s office of this decision.
Budget
Liaison had no report.
Academic
Liaison: Sen.
Porter reported that the Academic Liaison Committee is continuing the update of
the Faculty Guide. In order to provide
the most current information, the printed guide will list URLs where updated
information will appear. The committee
was asked to remain after adjournment.
An additional two months is estimated for completion this task.
The Chair reported that several requests had
recently been received for Faculty Guide information, and commended the
committee for their work.
Sen. Porter suggested that the Faculty web site
be updated from “under construction” to include information on how to access
information from the Faculty Guide or get a hard copy.
Student
Services Liaison had no report.
Ethics
had no report.
Special
Projects: Sen.
Fincher reported that this committee is currently working on deletion of a
paragraph from the Promotion and Tenure document, and the Professor Emeriti
nominations. The paragraph in the
P&T document was advised to be a non sequitur, as it refers to
recommendations of the Provost, when he in fact makes no recommendations. The entire P&T policy needs to be
reviewed and updated to more accurately reflect the current process. The Chair assigned this to the Operations
Committee for handling. Four
nominations for Senator Emeriti have been received, and they are waiting for
information on three more before reviewing the submissions.
Old Business:
The Chair reported that the Periodic Reviews of
Academic Administrators are both preparing drafts of a final document.
The Chair appointed Sen Porter, Sen. Lehmann, Sen. Rouse, and Sen. Kribs-Zaleta to serve on the Faculty Development Leave Committee. The committee will meet February 13 at 11:30 a.m. in DH 327.
President Witt reported that Spouse Activity
Cards would be upgraded to include tennis at no extra cost for the remainder of
this academic year. A modest increase
in fees may be necessary next year.
Direct deposit of expense checks is already
available on campus by signing a form through Human Resources.
The issue including student photos on class
rolls is under review. This may be
difficult to implement.
Regarding the review of the drop policy
requested by Sen. Porter, the Undergraduate Assembly has no records of the
previous review of this issue. It will
be re-assigned for review.
New Business:
Sen. Reinhartz asked if it was appropriate for
department chairs to serve on the senate, and expressed concerns regarding
chairs’ loyalty to faculty issues.
The Chair advised that current Bylaws allow
department chairs to serve, and will refer this issue to committee for review.
Sen. Porter expressed concern that some students
are being advised by UTA faculty and staff to “go to junior colleges to get
their basics out of the way.” Her
concerns were based on a recent article in the Shorthorn, which included a
quote from the Director of Advising.
President Witt will follow up on this, but felt
that the Shorthorn may have taken a quote out of context on this issue.
Sen. Kleiser expressed the concern of a faculty
member that too many students were enrolling in courses without the necessary
prerequisites. It was suggested that
computer screening be implemented to check prerequisites.
Vice President Dunn advised that the Undergraduate Assembly had reviewed this
issue and felt it would be problematic to implement blanket computer screening
due to the many exceptions allowed by departments. She suggested that each unit review this issue and consider
requiring clearance for certain courses by the departmental advisors.
Sen. Kleiser asked how faculty can ensure that
students are qualified for a class..
Vice President Dunn advised that faculty should announce prerequisites
on the first day of each class, and publish them in both the printed and
on-line syllabi
Sen. Elmasri advised that in Computer Science
Engineering, advisors must clear all upper level courses manually. They can generate computerized reports to
alert faculty to those in classes without proper prerequisites. Vice President Dunn advised that such a
policy could adversely affect transfer students whose transcripts had not yet
been reviewed. It was confirmed that a
faculty member could not drop a student from a course.
Sen. Amster reopened the discussion of time
frames for senate service, and the need to have senators available during summer
months.
The Chair advised that the Operating Procedures
Committee is working on this issue.
They are not yet ready to bring recommendations to the Senate
floor.
Sen. Amster asked if it might be possible for
the Senate to discuss certain confidential issues in closed session without any
of the Administration present.
President Witt indicated the Administration’s willingness to exit any
Senate meeting if requested to do so by the Chair. The Chair expressed his
appreciation for the excellent working relationship enjoyed by our faculty with
UTA administration. He advised that the
Presidential Advisory Committee precedes each of their meetings with the
President with a closed one-hour private session to discuss any issues.
Assoc. Vice President Moore advised the Chair
that Robert’s Rules of Order allow for an Executive Session any time such a
motion is made and approved. Such a
motion would require that all non-voting members clear the room upon approval of
the motion.
Announcements: There were no
announcements.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:45 p.m.
/lln