|
The
University Faculty and Associates Minutes The Fall Meeting of the University Faculty and Associates was held at 4:00 p.m. on Monday, September 26, 2005, in the University Center Rosebud Theatre. President James D. Spaniolo presided. Recognition of New Faculty and Associates. Provost Dana Dunn welcomed faculty and associates to the fall meeting of the University Faculty on behalf of herself and President Spaniolo. She specifically welcomed the new faculty and associates and asked them to stand for recognition. Recognition of Professors Emeriti. Seven retired professors were conferred with the honorary title of Professor Emeritus because of their exemplary service and dedication to the University and the community. Each individual received a framed certificate and a lapel pin. Recognized this year were: Carolyn A. Barros English Allan K. Butcher Political Science Jack Fitzer Electrical Engineering Richard D. McBride Architecture Charles V. Smith, Jr. Electrical Engineering Delbert A. Taebel Urban and Public Affairs Michael R. Yardley Architecture Remarks by the President. It’s great to be with you today and to be able to recognize our professors emeriti and to hear about the rich history and contributions they’ve made to our university. It is also appropriate that we recognize all our new faculty that are with us today. We are very proud to have them join our ranks at UT Arlington. I would like to begin by extending a warm welcome to all of you and
especially our new faculty members and faculty associates. I met many of you earlier this year at either
the new faculty orientation or the reception held in your honor at the library
a few weeks ago. By now I hope you have
had a chance to settle into the semester and come to appreciate what a special
university we have here at UT Arlington. It
is fitting that we recognize faculty members who have made extraordinary
contributions to the development of this University over the course of their
careers. To the professor emeriti, you
have our gratitude and your careers will serve as inspiring examples as we
continue to meet the mission of our University. The
agenda for today’s meeting honors the past and the rich contribution of our
colleagues, while at the same time looking forward to the future of our
University. This duality - - respecting
the past, while preparing for the challenges of the future - - is a theme that
merits all of our consideration and discussion. As
many of you know, especially the more senior members of the faculty, this
University has a rich and varied history.
The University has operated under several names, as both an independent
institution and as part of different university systems over the last 110 years. Over the years it has evolved from an
institution focused on narrow missions such as agriculture or military
preparation to one of the most comprehensive educational institutions in the
region. We have changed from an
institution primarily serving the local and surrounding communities to one that
literally educates students throughout the world. Our
university has grown and adapted to our changing environment. And we will continue to do so. The pace of institutional evolution is most
commonly incremental and at times difficult to observe. But
consistent incremental change, when aggregated over an extended period of time,
can produce significant transformations.
While I have been here for less than two years, it is clear to me that
our university today is not the same kind of place it was a decade ago, or even
five years ago. When
we adjourn, take the opportunity to visit with those we have honored here today
and ask them about their memories of UT Arlington when they began their
careers. They will tell you about a very
different place with a different mission.
It was an important, strong institution, appropriate for its time and
its place. The time and place in which
The University of Texas at In
recent months, I have had a number of conversations across campus as part of
our strategic planning process and as part of the process of getting to know
this university. If there has been one
consistent theme from these conversations, it is that the members of this
faculty wish to see this institution reach new levels of distinction – by
becoming one that is internationally renowned.
Simply
put, the faculty and administration of this university aspire for UT Arlington
to become a premier comprehensive research university. What is not yet widely known - inside or outside UT Arlington – is that we
are quietly moving step by step in that direction. In short, we are approaching the “tipping
point.” I
firmly believe that The University of Texas at I
do not have a crystal ball, nor do I have a precise timetable. I do believe we can make significant progress
toward that goal every year. In fact we
are beginning to do just that. For
example, last spring, Professor Ping Liu and Associate Professor Quiming Zhang from
our Physics Department were recipients of highly competitive $5 million grant
from the Department of Defense to investigate the application of
nanostructure-enhanced devises for energy conservation. UT
Arlington was one of just 27 universities to receive this award, including
Duke, Heeding
the wise advice of Dr. Clifton R. Wharton’s keynote speech at my investiture
almost two years ago, please note that I did use the word “flagship” or “top
tier.” What I am saying is that we can
become a major research university of distinction. In short, we can become what we seek to be as
a university, not what others want us to be or even perceive us to be. I challenge you to be part of that
collaborative process in developing that plan and vision for our future. Let
me be clear about what I mean when I refer to a leading research university. Such a university is one that obviously
excels in the heavily funded research fields.
But it is important to remember that it is also a university that finds
excellence in all fields of academic pursuit.
A leading university is one that plays a special role in the advancement
and promotion of the visual and performing arts and in the preparation of
scholars and professionals through rigorous and demanding professional
programs. A
leading research university is one that values all forms of scholarship, but
also places a premium on world-class teaching, mentoring, and the training of
the next generation of scholars. If
we are to become this sort of university, we must be candid about where we
currently stand and what remains to be accomplished. An honest assessment of our current status
would not be as one the nation’s top research universities, but rather more
accurately as an “emerging research university.” In
fact, this is the label used by the Coordinating Board to describe us and others
such as the A
moment ago, I spoke about the pace of change and the fact that most change,
especially at a university, occurs incrementally and unremarkably. Without special efforts on our part, our
University will continue to evolve and change in response to its environment,
but it will not be the dramatic change that is required to attain the research
university status we are seeking. If
we hope to become a major research university, we will need to each do
something more than we are currently doing.
Stated differently, if we intended to join the top public research
universities, each of us must find a way to contribute beyond what we typically
do in the normal course of our current academic lives. A change in our status, as well as our
reputation, will require accelerated growth, not normal incremental growth, and
it will require a commitment to this goal from faculty, staff, students, and
administrators. In other words, all of
us. It
will require each of us to become more engaged in all aspects of our
university. If
we hope to succeed, all constituencies on campus must join together to achieve
this goal. Just
what do I mean when I speak of an ‘engaged university’ and why is it important
to our efforts to be considered among our nation’s leading research
universities? In
the simplest terms, I believe an engaged university is one where each member of
the university community – faculty, staff, and students - contributes and
embraces the life of the university beyond what is minimally expected. The
University life offers intellectual and cultural enrichment. It provides a stimulating environment and it
fosters a venue for inquiry and the unfettered exchange of ideas. In addition to these traits, an engaged
university must have a strong internal focus with interdisciplinary
collaborations and enriching faculty-student interactions. An engaged university must also have clear and
strong connections to the world outside the boundaries of the campus through
scholarly activity that connects to our communities and meaningful public
service and contributes to the improvement of our society. We
have done a wonderful job in the past couple of years of enhancing the
experiences at our university. We have
drawn greater attention to the large number of traditions on campus and we have
initiated new traditions such as the New Student Convocation during the fall
and the all university graduation convocation at the conclusion of the academic
year. We recently recruited a new Vice
President for Student Affairs, Dr. Frank Lamas, who will be a catalyst and
facilitator for enriching the student life experience on our campus. Last
spring we announced our intent to enhance the campus life experience for our
faculty by creating, at long last, a university faculty club. Plans have been developed and construction is
about to begin on this facility in Davis Hall which will open during the spring
semester. We
have, and will continue to, make significant contributions to the life of the
university in terms of both physical and human resources. Our ambitious construction and renovation
process continues. In
the spring we will open the doors to our new Chemistry and Physics building which
will include a one-of-a-kind planetarium.
These facilities will serve not only our faculty and students but the
community and public as well. We will
also complete construction on a much needed storage building for our library
and newly renovated space for our growing International Office. During
the past three years we have added nearly 150 new faculty members to our ranks
with approximately 80 of these individuals representing expansion hires. That’s a dramatic example of how this
university is moving forward adding new faculty resources to our already strong
university. They
not only represent a significant infusion of new faculty, but they represent a
commitment to the future vitality of our university. These hires are the result of our aggressive
efforts to attract the most highly qualified faculty members from the world’s
most prestigious institutions – at both the junior and senior levels. All
of these efforts contribute to the life of the university and I have spoken in
more detail about these topics elsewhere. These changes to our university are
important, critical, improvements but, in the end, they are really the sort of
incremental changes that I mentioned earlier that are a necessary part of the
university’s natural growth and development. But
I’d like to challenge us to do more. To
reach the “tipping point” and beyond, to become a major research university, I
believe we need a more fully engaged university. We need a university that conducts business
in ways dramatically different from our current practice. We need more students who are committed to
high academic standards and determined to graduate on time. We need more faculty members who are
committed to working with students, both inside and outside the classroom and
lab, to see that students succeed. The
challenge here is daunting. Roughly half
of all high school graduates in the Last
year, a number of faculty and staff members served on a Graduation Rates Task
Force charged with investigating our low graduation rate and offering
suggestions for improving our graduation rate.
I am pleased to report that the efforts of this Task Force were
important enough so that UT System has encouraged other UT academic
institutions to engage in similar efforts.
While we work to implement the recommendations of the Task Force, I believe
part of the answer to improving graduation rates at UT Arlington is to find
innovative ways to engage students. For
example, Dr. Elizabeth Morrow, a cello performer in our Department of Music,
has found a way to engage her students.
Dr. Morrow, a world-class cellist, not only mentors students in her
classroom, but she actively seeks out aspiring, young talented musicians
throughout the state. Dr. Morrow
recently returned from Once
the students arrive at UT Arlington, Dr. Morrow continues her involvement in
activities that range from playing with their band to mentoring graduate
students who will be the next generation of music instructors. The simple thing to do would be for Dr.
Morrow to simply teach her assigned classes, serve on a few department
committees, and continue to master her personal performances. In contrast, Dr. Morrow, like many of you,
shares a passion for her profession and is engaged in a way that invigorates
and inspires her students to succeed. Dr.
Morrow is just one example of the many engaged faculty we have at UTA, and I
emphasize there are many, but we need more. To
have an engaged campus, we must also have scholars who are engaged in collaborative
research across disciplines and institutions.
Increasingly, the nation’s top research universities are engaged in
interdisciplinary research and funding agencies reward multi-institutional
proposals. To
encourage this type of research, last week President Our
decision to collaborate more extensively, to become partners as we never have
before is not motivated by collegiality alone.
It is because we think we can raise the level of accomplishment and
stature of our universities by working together as collaborators rather than
competitors or adversaries. To
become a leading research university, we need greater engagement from the
faculty in the development of the universities strategic direction. During
the past academic year, members of our university community provided valuable
input related to our strategic planning priorities. We held a number of campus-wide meetings to
gather reactions from a wide variety of offices. Using your feedback, the Deans of our
University worked with the Provost to translate the planning priorities into a
set of strategic goals, objectives, and strategies. It
is now time for you to provide feedback to the latest round of the planning
process. In the next few days, you will
receive an invitation from Provost Dunn and me to provide your reaction to the
goals, objectives, and strategies developed by the Deans. I encourage you to take the time review this
important document and provide comments.
I also ask that you invite your colleagues who are not here today to
join in this process. In
offering your comments, I would ask you to think about our goal of becoming one
our nation’s leading research institutions and determine whether we are
proposing the appropriate objectives and strategies to meet that goal. Based on your feedback this fall, we will
provide a draft strategic plan for your review during the spring semester. In
addition to continuing our strategic planning process, our University is currently
preparing for its SACS Reaccreditation visit which will take place next
year. Part of that process is the
selection of a topic for our Quality Enhancement Plan which will, along with
our strategic plan, form our university priorities in the coming years. Numerous announcements have been shared with
the faculty about this critical initiative, yet fewer than 150 members of the
faculty have offered their input. As
an emerging research university, our direction should be guided by an engaged
faculty. I strongly encourage you to
take the time to share your thoughts with us on this and other important
initiatives. A
leading research university should also have in place the infrastructure which
can supply the necessary resources to support our research, scholarly, and
creative activities. Provost Dunn and I
are committed to strengthening and providing more resources for our Office of
Research to facilitate the research efforts of our university by our
faculty. Since I have arrived, I have
significantly revamped three major administrative offices. The
Office of Development, under the leadership of Vice President Gary Cole, has
been refocused and reorganized and is now positioned to undertake major
development initiatives in partnering with our Schools and Colleges. While funding
relationships with donors takes time, there has already been significant
progress in raising funds. Our endowment which has been historically low is
increasing. For example, last month our The
result of this and other efforts will be to significantly increase the size of
our endowment. Similar efforts to
reorganize are underway in our Alumni Office and we have recently relocated
their offices in a building more appropriate to their mission on West Mitchell. Finally,
part of becoming a leading research university is about developing a unique,
recognizable identity. For too long, UT
Arlington has been in the background rather than in the forefront. We need a more compelling and
coherent identity – and we need to promote it.
That is about to change. In the coming
weeks and months, you will hear and see more about our efforts to increase our
visibility and more distinctly define our identity . . . and what it means to
be a ‘Maverick.’ Of
particular interest to many of you here will be a new university publication
that celebrates the research accomplishments of our faculty who are frequently
“Mavericks” in their academic field. My
favorite definition about Maverick is independent thinker. That’s the way I think of UT Arlington
Mavericks. Of course, promotion, advertising and media outreach alone cannot
not transform a university, but these efforts, coupled with increased research
and scholarly stature, are critical to moving UT Arlington forward toward our
goal. The
work that lies before us is substantial, but I am confident we are up to the
challenge. Just as Arlington State
College transformed itself from a two-year school to a four-year school, and
then later joined the UT System as UT Arlington and began to offer graduate
degrees, we too must move boldly beyond our current status of an emerging
research university. I
can think of no better group to rise to this challenge than a group of faculty
members who have consistently shown determination and a propensity to rise to
the challenges put before them. Helping
UT Arlington become one of the premier public research universities is our next
challenge. I urge you to become even
more engaged in the lives of our students.
I encourage you to become even more engaged in the life of your
discipline. I
encourage you to join with your colleagues in shaping the priorities of this
University. I challenge each of us to do
something this year to become more engaged in the life of the university than
we did last year. I also challenge each
of you to work to engage your colleagues in this important enterprise. The
goal before us is attainable and worth our efforts to see that The University
of Texas at Thank
you. Please join Provost Dunn and I in
the foyer for a reception honoring the new additions to our faculty and our
professor emeritus recipients. ADJOURNMENT. The meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m., followed by a reception in the foyer. Michael K. Moore Secretary /jw |