UT Arlington
Department of Physics
MavBall group picture
 
 Home | Summary Report | General Tests | Friction | Irregular Bounces | Absorbency | Compression Restitution | Wind Tunnel | Preliminary Recommendations | Media Coverage | Video | Credits

Friction Tests

In this experiment, a thin layer of silicon was attached to the surface of a long track to simulate contact with human skin (medical literature shows silicon to have a friction coefficient similar to the human palm). Small square patches, two inches per side, were cut from a conditioned leather ball and a new synthetic ball and affixed to the flat bottom surface of a hollow carrier, in order to make good contact with the silicon surface. A mass was placed inside the carrier to approximate the mass of the ball. A line was attached to the carrier and run parallel to the surface of contact and over a near-frictionless wheel. To measure the coefficient of static friction, hanging weights were added to the line in 10g increments until the carrier began to slide across the silicon surface (as shown in the diagram below and left). This experiment was first performed with the ball’s surface dry. Then to simulate human sweat, Visine was added to each 4 square inch slice of the ball’s surface, one drop at a time.

Friction test setup



Initial friction tests show a much higher coefficient of friction for the synthetic ball when dry. The coefficient of friction between the surface of the synthetic ball and a silicon surface is about 3.2 for our experimental setup. The friction coefficient is 1.7 for the leather ball, using the same procedure. Friction tests with Visine applied to the ball’s surface show that the coefficient of friction increases for the leather ball. After repeated application of drops, the coefficient increased gradually by at least 30% for the leather ball, thereby making it more "gripable". After quasi-saturation, adding drops reduced the coefficient by 20%, relative to a dry ball. However, for the synthetic ball, the coefficient of friction reduces immediately by 55% with the first drop of liquid. A larger reduction is seen with repeated application of liquid. In conclusion, the wet synthetic ball is significantly more slippery compared to wet leather balls.



 

Next >> Irregular Bounces

  © 2006 The University of Texas at Arlington
Department of Physics, Box 19059, Arlington, Texas 76019
Phone 817.272.2266 | Fax 817.272.3637